Muir Gray

1.8k citations
66 papers · 1.0k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Muir Gray

62 papers receiving 955 citations

Peers

Muir Gray
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • General Health Professions 273
  • Pharmacy 32
  • Health Information Management 27
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 157
  • Family Practice 10
Replace Keith Meadows with:
Keith Meadows United Kingdom
Fredrick D. Ashbury Canada
Beverley M. Essue Canada
Lisa Opipari‐Arrigan United States
Jillian Harvey United States
Gabriela R. Oates United States
Samantha Coster United Kingdom
Thomas C. Rosenthal United States
Monica Fletcher United Kingdom
Neil R. Bell Canada
Muir Gray relative to Keith Meadows United Kingdom Keith Meadows's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Keith Meadows · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Muir Gray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Muir Gray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Muir Gray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Muir Gray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Muir Gray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Muir Gray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Muir Gray. The network helps show where Muir Gray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Muir Gray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Muir Gray Line = papers co-authored together Muir Gray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987130
2 2019103
3 201598
4 198692
5 201380
6 199256
7 198739
8 202030
9 201922
10 201821
11 201921
12 201618
13 201816
14
Promoting Triple Value Healthcare in Countries with Universal Healthcare.
201616
15 200615
16 201714
17 201713
18 201713
19 201712
20 201312

About Muir Gray

Muir Gray is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Conservation and Clinical Psychology, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (13 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (7 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (6 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (5 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (5 papers), Art Therapy and Mental Health (5 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (3 papers) and Obesity and Health Practices (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (273 citations), Pharmacy (32 citations), Health Information Management (27 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (157 citations) and Family Practice (10 citations). Muir Gray has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Anant Jani, E. Fullard, G. Herbert Fowler, C Warlow, Peter Sandercock, John Bamford, Susan M. Bailey, Daniel Maughan, James Ansell and A Henderson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, BMJ, Journal of Public Health, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice and The Lancet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact