Muhammad Gul

413 citations
12 papers · 81 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Muhammad Gul

11 papers receiving 78 citations

Peers

Muhammad Gul
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Infectious Diseases 40
  • Internal Medicine 8
  • Neurology 18
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 6
  • Modeling and Simulation 4
Replace Karin Veerman with:
Karin Veerman Netherlands
Robin Dharia United States
Xu Shen China
Jos A. H. van Oers Netherlands
Philippine Eloy France
Riccardo Mantovani Italy
Joseph I. Bailey United States
Mathew Jones United States
Ali Jaffery United States
Trine Kåsine Norway
Muhammad Gul relative to Karin Veerman Netherlands Karin Veerman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Karin Veerman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Muhammad Gul

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Muhammad Gul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Muhammad Gul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Muhammad Gul more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Muhammad Gul

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Muhammad Gul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Muhammad Gul. The network helps show where Muhammad Gul may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Muhammad Gul, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Muhammad Gul Line = papers co-authored together Muhammad Gul links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 202030
2 202025
3 20238
4 20217
5 20224
6 20192
7 20211
8 20161
9 20181
10 20181
11 20201
12 20240

About Muhammad Gul

Muhammad Gul is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Internal Medicine, having authored 12 papers that have together received 81 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (4 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (2 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (2 papers), Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (1 paper), Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases (1 paper), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (1 paper), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (1 paper) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (40 citations), Internal Medicine (8 citations), Neurology (18 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (6 citations) and Modeling and Simulation (4 citations). Muhammad Gul has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Muhammad Imran, Ahmad Khan, Krunalkumar Patel, Rajkumar Doshi, Muhammad Suleman, Jeremy P. Wood, Michael Anstead, Steven P. Kutalek, Muhammad Imran and Vraj P. Shah. Their work appears in journals such as Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine, Pulmonary Circulation, Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease, Frontiers in Medicine and Critical Care Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact