Muhammad Chatha
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Psychedelics and Drug Studies
- Toxicology top 5%
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Papers in
-
- Psychedelics and Drug Studies 8
-
- Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior 5
- Co-authors
- Adam L. Halberstadt (11 shared papers)Simon D. Brandt (7 shared papers)Adam K. Klein (4 shared papers)Jason V. Wallach (3 shared papers)Stephen J. Chapman (2 shared papers)John D. McCorvy (2 shared papers)Alexander Stratford (3 shared papers)Emilie I. Anderson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Neuropharmacology (3 papers)Psychopharmacology (2 papers)Journal of Psychopharmacology (1 paper)Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience (1 paper)European Journal of Pharmacology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Muhammad Chatha
13 papers receiving 445 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Clinical Psychology 389
- Toxicology 48
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 248
- Biological Psychiatry 30
- Organic Chemistry 209
Countries citing papers authored by Muhammad Chatha
This map shows the geographic impact of Muhammad Chatha's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Muhammad Chatha with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Muhammad Chatha more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Muhammad Chatha
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Muhammad Chatha. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Muhammad Chatha. The network helps show where Muhammad Chatha may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Muhammad Chatha, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 205 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 79 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 34 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 24 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 0 |
About Muhammad Chatha
Muhammad Chatha is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Organic Chemistry, Nutrition and Dietetics and Virology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 459 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychedelics and Drug Studies (8 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (5 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (4 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (2 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (1 paper), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (1 paper) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (389 citations), Toxicology (48 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (248 citations), Biological Psychiatry (30 citations) and Organic Chemistry (209 citations). Muhammad Chatha has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Adam L. Halberstadt, Simon D. Brandt, Adam K. Klein, Jason V. Wallach, Stephen J. Chapman, John D. McCorvy, Alexander Stratford, Emilie I. Anderson, Mark A. Geyer and Jesper Langgaard Kristensen. Their work appears in journals such as Neuropharmacology, Psychopharmacology, Journal of Psychopharmacology, Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience and European Journal of Pharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.