Muhammad Aftab

995 citations
49 papers · 777 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Muhammad Aftab

43 papers receiving 741 citations

Peers

Muhammad Aftab
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 400
  • Finance 214
  • Economics and Econometrics 537
  • Accounting 117
  • Information Systems and Management 40
Replace Shuh-Chyi Doong with:
Shuh-Chyi Doong Taiwan
Chong Soo Pyun United States
Yen‐Hsien Lee Taiwan
Aleksandar Šević Ireland
Rubi Ahmad Malaysia
Ali M. Parhizgari United States
Elizabeth Klee United States
Nedal Al‐Fayoumi Qatar
Peter Hoffmann Germany
Bora Aktan Bahrain
Muhammad Aftab relative to Shuh-Chyi Doong Taiwan Shuh-Chyi Doong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Shuh-Chyi Doong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Muhammad Aftab

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Muhammad Aftab's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Muhammad Aftab with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Muhammad Aftab more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Muhammad Aftab

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Muhammad Aftab. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Muhammad Aftab. The network helps show where Muhammad Aftab may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Muhammad Aftab, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Muhammad Aftab Line = papers co-authored together Muhammad Aftab links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017142
2 2013129
3 2017106
4 202077
5 201628
6 201823
7 202022
8 201219
9 202318
10 201718
11 202017
12 201614
13 201111
14 201611
15
The Effect of Corporate Strategy and Capital Structure on Performance of Banking Sector of Pakistan
201210
16 201510
17 201710
18 202210
19 20238
20 20178

About Muhammad Aftab

Muhammad Aftab is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Finance, Accounting and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 49 papers that have together received 777 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Market Dynamics and Volatility (30 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (27 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (10 papers), Global trade and economics (9 papers), Energy, Environment, Economic Growth (6 papers), Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling (5 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (4 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (400 citations), Finance (214 citations), Economics and Econometrics (537 citations), Accounting (117 citations) and Information Systems and Management (40 citations). Muhammad Aftab has collaborated with scholars based in Pakistan, Malaysia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mohsen Bahmani‐Óskooee, Muhammad Mohsin Butt, Izlin Ismail, Saba Qureshi, Tareq Saeed, Elie Bouri, Rubi Ahmad, Kate Phylaktis, Hanafiah Harvey and Syed Zulfiqar Ali Shah. Their work appears in journals such as Empirica, China Finance Review International, Nano Letters, Eurasian economic review : and Soft Computing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact