Muhammad Aftab

2.0k citations
102 papers · 1.2k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Muhammad Aftab

91 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Muhammad Aftab
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Health Information Management 72
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 254
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 356
  • Gender Studies 73
  • Surgery 267
Replace William Chan with:
William Chan Australia
Walter E. Pofahl United States
Steven P. Sedlis United States
E. Hanisch Germany
Mitul Patel United States
Attila Frigyesi Sweden
Jun Shao China
Kai M. Eggers Sweden
Max M. He United States
Wouter Ouwerkerk Netherlands
Muhammad Aftab relative to William Chan Australia William Chan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.2×
William Chan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Muhammad Aftab

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Muhammad Aftab's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Muhammad Aftab with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Muhammad Aftab more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Muhammad Aftab

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Muhammad Aftab. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Muhammad Aftab. The network helps show where Muhammad Aftab may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Muhammad Aftab, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Muhammad Aftab Line = papers co-authored together Muhammad Aftab links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 102 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017128
2 201995
3 201664
4 201059
5 201945
6 201743
7 201434
8 201933
9 201532
10 200931
11 201429
12 200728
13 201926
14 201826
15 201626
16 201622
17 202020
18 201418
19 201517
20 201617

About Muhammad Aftab

Muhammad Aftab is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Biomedical Engineering and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 102 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (30 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (12 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (11 papers), Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (9 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (7 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (6 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (5 papers) and Acute Kidney Injury Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (72 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (254 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (356 citations), Gender Studies (73 citations) and Surgery (267 citations). Muhammad Aftab has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Pakistan and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include T. Brett Reece, Joseph S. Coselli, Tanvir Ahmad, Sajjad Haider Bhatti, Muhammad Ali Raza, David A. Fullerton, Eric E. Roselli, Jay D. Pal, David H. Berger and Mohammed Rigi. Their work appears in journals such as The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, Journal of Surgical Research and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact