Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

9.0k citations
826 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

725 papers receiving 8.4k citations

Peers

Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Comparison fields: 5 of 159
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 975
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 2.8k
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 575
  • Developmental Neuroscience 413
  • Emergency Medicine 794
Replace Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine with:
Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine France
Anesthesiology Clinics United States
BJA Education United Kingdom
Journal of Intensive Care Japan
Critical Care and Resuscitation Australia
Journal of Emergencies Trauma and Shock United States
Critical Care Research and Practice United States
Journal of the Intensive Care Society United Kingdom
Drugs in R&D United States
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Iran
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia relative to Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine France Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.2×
Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia.

About Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

The 826 papers published in Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia in the last decades have received a total of 9.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (405 papers), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (85 papers), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (89 papers), Emergency Medicine (106 papers) and Surgery (426 papers) specifically the topics of Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (219 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (119 papers), Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (107 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (102 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (98 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (97 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (79 papers) and Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (69 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia are William C. Oliver, John M. Murkin, Charles Weissman, Eugene A. Hessel, Bruce D. Spiess, Harvey L. Edmonds, André Denault, Alain Deschamps, James G. Bovill and Michael Koeppen.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact