MUF Kirschbaum
Impact in
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
- Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
-
- Forest ecology and management
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Papers in
-
- Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics 6
- Forest Management and Policy 1
-
- Plant responses to elevated CO2 3
- Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies 1
- Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control 1
- Co-authors
- Graham D. Farquhar (1 shared paper)R. N. Cromer (2 shared papers)Ying‐Ping Wang (1 shared paper)H. N. Comins (1 shared paper)S. Pongracic (1 shared paper)R. J. Raison (1 shared paper)Guillaume Simioni (1 shared paper)Peter Ritson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Functional Plant Biology (4 papers)Tree Physiology (1 paper)Canadian Journal of Forest Research (1 paper)Australian Journal of Botany (1 paper)Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandAustralia
In The Last Decade
MUF Kirschbaum
9 papers receiving 428 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Global and Planetary Change 367
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 144
- Soil Science 76
- Plant Science 280
- Atmospheric Science 76
Countries citing papers authored by MUF Kirschbaum
This map shows the geographic impact of MUF Kirschbaum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by MUF Kirschbaum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites MUF Kirschbaum more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by MUF Kirschbaum
This network shows the impact of papers produced by MUF Kirschbaum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by MUF Kirschbaum. The network helps show where MUF Kirschbaum may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside MUF Kirschbaum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1984 | 218 | |
| 2 | 1990 | 72 | |
| 3 | 1992 | 71 | |
| 4 | 1992 | 41 | |
| 5 | 1997 | 28 | |
| 6 | 1992 | 26 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 10 | |
| 9 | 1991 | 5 |
About MUF Kirschbaum
MUF Kirschbaum is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Soil Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 488 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (6 papers), Plant responses to elevated CO2 (3 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (2 papers), Seedling growth and survival studies (2 papers), Forest ecology and management (2 papers), Forest Management and Policy (1 paper), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (1 paper) and Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (367 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (144 citations), Soil Science (76 citations), Plant Science (280 citations) and Atmospheric Science (76 citations). MUF Kirschbaum has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Graham D. Farquhar, R. N. Cromer, Ying‐Ping Wang, H. N. Comins, S. Pongracic, R. J. Raison, Guillaume Simioni, Peter Ritson, J.F. McGrath and Bob Carswell. Their work appears in journals such as Functional Plant Biology, Tree Physiology, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Australian Journal of Botany and Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.