M.T. Doel
Impact in
- Biotechnology top 5%
- Enzyme Production and Characterization
-
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- RNA Research and Splicing
- DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
- Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Papers in
-
- DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry 5
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 4
- Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research 3
- RNA Research and Splicing 3
- RNA modifications and cancer 2
- Chemical Synthesis and Analysis 2
-
- Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls 2
- Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies 1
- Co-authors
- N. H. Carey (4 shared papers)Peter A. Lowe (3 shared papers)Sarojani Angal (2 shared papers)Fiona A. O. Marston (1 shared paper)Timothy Harris (2 shared papers)Michael Houghton (1 shared paper)J.S. Emtage (1 shared paper)A. S. JONES (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Nucleic Acids Research (3 papers)Nature Biotechnology (1 paper)Tetrahedron Letters (1 paper)Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications (1 paper)Tetrahedron (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaChina
In The Last Decade
M.T. Doel
13 papers receiving 705 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Biotechnology 128
- Molecular Biology 641
- Cell Biology 70
- Genetics 117
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 56
Countries citing papers authored by M.T. Doel
This map shows the geographic impact of M.T. Doel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.T. Doel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.T. Doel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M.T. Doel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.T. Doel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.T. Doel. The network helps show where M.T. Doel may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside M.T. Doel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1984 | 208 | |
| 2 | 1983 | 132 | |
| 3 | 1982 | 97 | |
| 4 | 1976 | 93 | |
| 5 | 1977 | 82 | |
| 6 | 1976 | 51 | |
| 7 | 1969 | 35 | |
| 8 | 1973 | 30 | |
| 9 | 1974 | 25 | |
| 10 | 1974 | 21 | |
| 11 | 1973 | 19 | |
| 12 | 1974 | 10 | |
| 13 | 1980 | 4 |
About M.T. Doel
M.T. Doel is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Ecology, Oncology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 13 papers that have together received 807 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (5 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (4 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (3 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (3 papers), Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls (2 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (2 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers) and Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (128 citations), Molecular Biology (641 citations), Cell Biology (70 citations), Genetics (117 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (56 citations). M.T. Doel has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include N. H. Carey, Peter A. Lowe, Sarojani Angal, Fiona A. O. Marston, Timothy Harris, Michael Houghton, J.S. Emtage, A. S. JONES, Michael J. Smith and Nadine S. Taylor. Their work appears in journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, Nature Biotechnology, Tetrahedron Letters, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications and Tetrahedron.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.