M.P. Prim

46 papers receiving 659 citations

Peers

M.P. Prim
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Otorhinolaryngology 177
  • Neurology 212
  • Surgery 363
  • Internal Medicine 30
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 28
Replace Muhammad Shakeel with:
Muhammad Shakeel United Kingdom
F. Portier France
Daniel P. Hsu United States
Sean Loughran United Kingdom
Vasileios A. Lachanas Greece
Jeffrey P. Lüdemann Canada
Hüseyin Yaman Türkiye
William H. Moretz United States
Seçil Arslanoğlu Türkiye
Mira Finkensieper Germany
M.P. Prim relative to Muhammad Shakeel United Kingdom Muhammad Shakeel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Muhammad Shakeel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M.P. Prim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.P. Prim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.P. Prim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.P. Prim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.P. Prim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.P. Prim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.P. Prim. The network helps show where M.P. Prim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M.P. Prim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M.P. Prim Line = papers co-authored together M.P. Prim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199880
2 199976
3 200169
4 200554
5 200232
6 200030
7 199930
8 200224
9 200624
10 200023
11 200023
12 200322
13 200517
14 199916
15 200215
16 201114
17 200113
18 199612
19 200111
20 200211

About M.P. Prim

M.P. Prim is a scholar working on Surgery, Physiology, Otorhinolaryngology, Neurology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 50 papers that have together received 701 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (7 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (6 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (6 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (6 papers), Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research (6 papers), Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (5 papers), Voice and Speech Disorders (4 papers) and Head and Neck Cancer Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (177 citations), Neurology (212 citations), Surgery (363 citations), Internal Medicine (30 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (28 citations). M.P. Prim has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Juan Ignacio de Diego, Rosário Madero, Javiér Gavilán, David Hardisson, Noelia Sastre, José María Verdaguer, Elia Pérez‐Fernández, Víctor Jiménez‐Yuste, Manuel Nistal and Carlos de la Torre. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, Otolaryngology, Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology, The Laryngoscope and European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact