Moshe Coll

3.5k citations
85 papers · 2.8k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

Moshe Coll

83 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Moshe Coll
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Insect Science 2.2k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.3k
  • Plant Science 1.3k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 303
  • Ecology 403
Replace Zsofia Szendrei with:
Zsofia Szendrei United States
David R. Gillespie Canada
W. Powell United Kingdom
Stephen Goldson New Zealand
Mark G. Wright United States
Roy G. Van Driesche United States
Tibor Bukovinszky Netherlands
Kevin M. Heinz United States
Paul J. Ode United States
Gregory M. Loeb United States
Moshe Coll relative to Zsofia Szendrei United States Zsofia Szendrei's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Zsofia Szendrei · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Moshe Coll

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Moshe Coll's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Moshe Coll with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Moshe Coll more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Moshe Coll

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Moshe Coll. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Moshe Coll. The network helps show where Moshe Coll may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Moshe Coll, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Moshe Coll Line = papers co-authored together Moshe Coll links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 85 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002469
2 1995212
3 2011152
4 1995148
5 2001130
6 1996108
7 199471
8 200069
9 199162
10 200053
11 200453
12 200753
13 199750
14 199749
15 200048
16 199643
17 200543
18 201142
19 200642
20 200841

About Moshe Coll

Moshe Coll is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, having authored 85 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (61 papers), Plant and animal studies (32 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (23 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (19 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (13 papers), Hemiptera Insect Studies (9 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (7 papers) and Biological Control of Invasive Species (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (2.2k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.3k citations), Plant Science (1.3k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (303 citations) and Ecology (403 citations). Moshe Coll has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Moshe Guershon, Dale G. Bottrell, Richard L. Ridgway, Shalom W. Applebaum, George K. Roderick, Betty Benrey, Pedro Barbosa, William O. Lamp, Lesley Hughes and Yael Lubin. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Control, Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, Environmental Entomology, Ecological Entomology and Journal of Economic Entomology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact