Mons Bendixen

4.0k citations
47 papers · 959 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Mons Bendixen

43 papers receiving 910 citations

Peers

Mons Bendixen
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Gender Studies 227
  • Clinical Psychology 433
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 252
  • Health 125
  • Social Psychology 250
Replace Angela M. Neal with:
Angela M. Neal United States
Danielle Popp United States
Christopher Kilmartin United States
Eduardo A. Vasquez United Kingdom
Andrea L. Meltzer United States
Rochelle M. Burnaford United States
Jennifer Aubé Canada
Sara E. Gutierres United States
Alexander C. Jensen United States
A. L. Greene United States
Mons Bendixen relative to Angela M. Neal United States Angela M. Neal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Angela M. Neal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mons Bendixen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mons Bendixen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mons Bendixen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mons Bendixen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mons Bendixen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mons Bendixen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mons Bendixen. The network helps show where Mons Bendixen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Mons Bendixen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mons Bendixen Line = papers co-authored together Mons Bendixen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003105
2 199497
3 199976
4 202161
5 201750
6 201248
7 200543
8 201542
9 201733
10 201632
11 201832
12 201831
13 201325
14 201723
15 201723
16 201422
17 201421
18 201420
19 201316
20 201914

About Mons Bendixen

Mons Bendixen is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Gender Studies, having authored 47 papers that have together received 959 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (20 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (10 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (9 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (8 papers), Marriage and Sexual Relationships (8 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (7 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (5 papers) and Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (227 citations), Clinical Psychology (433 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (252 citations), Health (125 citations) and Social Psychology (250 citations). Mons Bendixen has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair, Dan Olweus, Inger M. Endresen, David M. Buss, Berit Schei, Trond Viggo Grøntvedt, Asbjørn Dyrendal, Ute Gabriel, Kelly Asao and Françoise D. Alsaker. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Evolutionary Psychology, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, Evolution and Human Behavior and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact