Mongkol Techakumphu

149 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Mongkol Techakumphu
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Reproductive Medicine 860
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 508
  • Small Animals 338
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.1k
  • Animal Science and Zoology 308
Replace T. K. Mohanty with:
T. K. Mohanty India
Wojciech Niżański Poland
A.T. Peter United States
Giovanni Michele Lacalandra Italy
Marie Saint‐Dizier France
Manuel Ramón Spain
T. Wise United States
S. Blöttner Germany
P. Humblot France
B.R. Downey Canada
Mongkol Techakumphu relative to T. K. Mohanty India T. K. Mohanty's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
T. K. Mohanty · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mongkol Techakumphu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mongkol Techakumphu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mongkol Techakumphu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mongkol Techakumphu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mongkol Techakumphu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mongkol Techakumphu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mongkol Techakumphu. The network helps show where Mongkol Techakumphu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mongkol Techakumphu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mongkol Techakumphu Line = papers co-authored together Mongkol Techakumphu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 154 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008121
2 2010108
3 201294
4 200681
5 201067
6 200855
7 201053
8 200453
9 201052
10 201047
11 200846
12 201145
13 200842
14 200640
15 201337
16 201135
17 201134
18 200832
19 201531
20 200927

About Mongkol Techakumphu

Mongkol Techakumphu is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine, Genetics, Agronomy and Crop Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 154 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (82 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (53 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (41 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (30 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (23 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (21 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (17 papers) and Ovarian function and disorders (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (860 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (508 citations), Small Animals (338 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.1k citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (308 citations). Mongkol Techakumphu has collaborated with scholars based in Thailand, Japan and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Padet Tummaruk, Wichai Tantasuparuk, Theerawat Tharasanit, Annop Kunavongkrit, Kaywalee Chatdarong, Nutthee Am-in, R. N. Kirkwood, Eva Axnér, Paweena Thuwanut and Sirirak Buarpung. Their work appears in journals such as Theriogenology, Reproduction in Domestic Animals, Animal Reproduction Science, Reproduction Fertility and Development and Journal of Reproduction and Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact