Mona O’Moore

24 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Mona O’Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Social Psychology 949
  • Safety Research 195
  • Clinical Psychology 396
  • Education 430
  • Health 88
Replace Frank C. Sacco with:
Frank C. Sacco United States
Laura M. Crothers United States
Brendan J. Byrne Philippines
Lorrie K. Sippola Canada
Mari Carmen Martínez-Monteagudo Spain
Sonia Sharp United Kingdom
Belén Martínez–Ferrer Spain
Stephen Brand United States
Miranda Sentse Netherlands
JoLynn V. Carney United States
Mona O’Moore relative to Frank C. Sacco United States Frank C. Sacco's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Frank C. Sacco · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mona O’Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mona O’Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mona O’Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mona O’Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mona O’Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mona O’Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mona O’Moore. The network helps show where Mona O’Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mona O’Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mona O’Moore Line = papers co-authored together Mona O’Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001384
2 2004237
3 2002103
4 200089
5 199872
6 201255
7 201351
8 201239
9 200735
10 200424
11 201119
12 197816
13
Cyber-Bullying: The Irish Experience
201314
14
A study of the aetiology of autism from a study of birth and family characteristics.
197212
15 201310
16
Understanding School Bullying: A Guide for Parents and Teachers
201110
17 20006
18 19905
19 19805
20 20134

About Mona O’Moore

Mona O’Moore is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Safety Research, Clinical Psychology, Education and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (13 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (4 papers), Workplace Violence and Bullying (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Youth Development and Social Support (4 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (2 papers), Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (2 papers) and Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (949 citations), Safety Research (195 citations), Clinical Psychology (396 citations), Education (430 citations) and Health (88 citations). Mona O’Moore has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Beatriz Pereira, Mike Eslea, Ersilia Menesini, Joaquín Antonio Mora Merchán, Peter K. Smith, Stephen James Minton, Murray Smith, Jean M. Lynch, Lucie Corcoran and Elizabeth Nixon. Their work appears in journals such as Aggressive Behavior, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Pastoral Care in Education, Personality and Individual Differences and Child Care Health and Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact