Mojca Čepič

98 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Mojca Čepič
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 1.6k
  • Spectroscopy 772
  • Organic Chemistry 545
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 297
  • Materials Chemistry 380
Replace Yu. P. Panarin with:
Yu. P. Panarin Ireland
Per Rudquist Sweden
V. Görtz United Kingdom
J. P. Marcerou France
Mamatha Nagaraj United Kingdom
Nataša Vaupotič Slovenia
S. A. Pikin Russia
M. G. Tamba United Kingdom
W. Kuczyński Poland
Y. Galerne France
Mojca Čepič relative to Yu. P. Panarin Ireland Yu. P. Panarin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Yu. P. Panarin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mojca Čepič

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mojca Čepič's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mojca Čepič with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mojca Čepič more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mojca Čepič

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mojca Čepič. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mojca Čepič. The network helps show where Mojca Čepič may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mojca Čepič, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mojca Čepič Line = papers co-authored together Mojca Čepič links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 105 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995137
2 2010125
3 1998110
4 200197
5 199394
6 200374
7 200171
8 200270
9 200257
10 200556
11 200144
12 200342
13 199141
14 200535
15 200635
16 201134
17 201434
18 202329
19 200828
20 199727

About Mojca Čepič

Mojca Čepič is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Spectroscopy, Organic Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Molecular Biology, having authored 105 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (67 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (27 papers), Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (21 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (19 papers), Photonic Crystals and Applications (12 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (11 papers), Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies (10 papers) and Advanced Materials and Mechanics (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (1.6k citations), Spectroscopy (772 citations), Organic Chemistry (545 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (297 citations) and Materials Chemistry (380 citations). Mojca Čepič has collaborated with scholars based in Slovenia, Poland and Japan. Frequent co-authors include B. Žekš, Ewa Górecka, Damian Pociecha, Nataša Vaupotič, Józef Mieczkowski, Hideo Takezoe, R. Blinc, G. Heppke, Igor Muševič and Miha Škarabot. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Liquid Crystals, Phase Transitions, Physical review. E and ChemPhysChem.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact