Countries where authors publish in Phase Transitions
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Phase Transitions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Phase Transitions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phase Transitions more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Phase Transitions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Phase Transitions.
About Phase Transitions
The 3.3k papers published in Phase Transitions in the last decades have received a total of 37.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Phase Transitions usually cover Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (845 papers), Condensed Matter Physics (535 papers), Materials Chemistry (1.7k papers), General Materials Science (38 papers) and Geophysics (171 papers) specifically the topics of Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (771 papers), Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials (521 papers), Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (424 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (288 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (207 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (188 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (170 papers) and Material Dynamics and Properties (115 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Phase Transitions are T. Furukawa, Ekhard K. H. Salje, Gustau Catalán, Paweł E. Tomaszewski, Mahmoud A. Hamad, David C Rubie, Alexander K. Tagantsev, Takeji Hashimoto, T. Kaneyoshi and J. Petzelt.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.