Mohammad Ibrahim

502 citations
42 papers · 352 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Mohammad Ibrahim

35 papers receiving 337 citations

Peers

Mohammad Ibrahim
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 84
  • Biochemistry 45
  • Pharmacology 49
  • Biological Psychiatry 10
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 48
Replace Mohammad Forhad Khan with:
Mohammad Forhad Khan Bangladesh
Mohammad Khushtar India
Arif‐ullah Khan Pakistan
Donatella Cicia Italy
Mahdieh Eftekhari Iran
Ahmed I. Yousef Egypt
Bruno Rodrigues Arruda Brazil
Syed Uzair Ali Shah Pakistan
Selen İlgün Türkiye
Gulam Mohammed Husain India
Mohammad Ibrahim relative to Mohammad Forhad Khan Bangladesh Mohammad Forhad Khan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Mohammad Forhad Khan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mohammad Ibrahim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mohammad Ibrahim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mohammad Ibrahim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mohammad Ibrahim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mohammad Ibrahim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mohammad Ibrahim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mohammad Ibrahim. The network helps show where Mohammad Ibrahim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mohammad Ibrahim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mohammad Ibrahim Line = papers co-authored together Mohammad Ibrahim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202052
2 201936
3 202227
4 202125
5 201919
6 201617
7 202116
8 202115
9 202215
10 201913
11 202411
12 202311
13 20199
14 20139
15 20258
16 20198
17 20258
18 20197
19 20217
20 20227

About Mohammad Ibrahim

Mohammad Ibrahim is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Pharmacology, Biochemistry, Plant Science and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 42 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytochemicals and Medicinal Plants (6 papers), Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies (5 papers), Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication (4 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (3 papers), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (3 papers), Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection (3 papers), Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection (3 papers) and Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (84 citations), Biochemistry (45 citations), Pharmacology (49 citations), Biological Psychiatry (10 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (48 citations). Mohammad Ibrahim has collaborated with scholars based in India, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Sayeed Ahmad, Sultan Zahiruddin, Rabea Parveen, Bushra Parveen, Washim Khan, Gaurav Gaurav, Mohammad Ahmed Khan, Sanchit Sharma, Anil Kumar Sharma and Md Mushfiqur Rahman Fahim. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Energy Storage, Journal of AOAC International, Pharmacognosy Magazine, Frontiers in Pharmacology and ACS Omega.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact