Mohamed Farook

788 citations
25 papers · 577 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Mohamed Farook

25 papers receiving 543 citations

Peers

Mohamed Farook
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Ophthalmology 118
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 229
  • Epidemiology 210
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 21
  • Rehabilitation 15
Replace Ashkan Eliasy with:
Ashkan Eliasy United Kingdom
Michael Müller Germany
Yung‐Jen Chen Taiwan
Daniel Waren United States
Jia Ying Lee Singapore
Christoph Amstutz Switzerland
Jakub Olczak Sweden
In Sik Lee South Korea
Anders Højslet Vestergaard Denmark
Roberto Vanin Pinto Ribeiro Canada
Mohamed Farook relative to Ashkan Eliasy United Kingdom Ashkan Eliasy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ashkan Eliasy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mohamed Farook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mohamed Farook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mohamed Farook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mohamed Farook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mohamed Farook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mohamed Farook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mohamed Farook. The network helps show where Mohamed Farook may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mohamed Farook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mohamed Farook Line = papers co-authored together Mohamed Farook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Prevalence rates of refractive errors in Sumatra, Indonesia.
2002129
2 201969
3 201959
4 201839
5 200538
6 201133
7 202331
8 201726
9 201824
10 201420
11 201519
12 201517
13 201116
14 201915
15 202012
16 20169
17
Corneal Ectasia Risk And Percentage Tissue Altered In Myopic Patients Presenting For Refractive Surgery
20194
18 20204
19 20223
20 20193

About Mohamed Farook

Mohamed Farook is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Epidemiology, Molecular Biology and Ophthalmology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 577 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corneal surgery and disorders (8 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (4 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (3 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (3 papers), Bone and Joint Diseases (1 paper), Chemotherapy-induced organ toxicity mitigation (1 paper), Renal cell carcinoma treatment (1 paper) and Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (118 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (229 citations), Epidemiology (210 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (21 citations) and Rehabilitation (15 citations). Mohamed Farook has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Singapore and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Marcus Ang, Jodhbir S. Mehta, Donald Tan, Seang‐Mei Saw, Hla Myint Htoon, Gus Gazzard, David Koh, Kevin Newman, Riazuddin Mohammed and Ashraf M. Mahmoud. Their work appears in journals such as Translational Vision Science & Technology, Journal of Refractive Surgery, Ophthalmology, Optometry and Vision Science and Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact