Moé Kishida
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Resilience and Mental Health
Papers in
-
- Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions 7
- COVID-19 and Mental Health 3
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors 2
- Health 3
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology 3
- Co-authors
- Steriani Elavsky (9 shared papers)Kamila Dvořáková (3 shared papers)Mark T. Greenberg (3 shared papers)Patricia C. Broderick (1 shared paper)Linda Larkey (2 shared papers)Jacqueline Mogle (2 shared papers)Sunhye Bai (1 shared paper)Scherezade K. Mama (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Mindfulness (2 papers)Journal of American College Health (2 papers)Health Psychology (1 paper)Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society (1 paper)Journal of Happiness Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCzechia
In The Last Decade
Moé Kishida
10 papers receiving 331 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Applied Psychology 62
- Clinical Psychology 242
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 99
- Social Psychology 88
- Conservation 10
Countries citing papers authored by Moé Kishida
This map shows the geographic impact of Moé Kishida's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Moé Kishida with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Moé Kishida more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Moé Kishida
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Moé Kishida. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Moé Kishida. The network helps show where Moé Kishida may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Moé Kishida, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 152 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 49 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 38 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 27 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 1 |
About Moé Kishida
Moé Kishida is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Health, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 339 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (7 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Physical Activity and Health (3 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (3 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (2 papers) and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (62 citations), Clinical Psychology (242 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (99 citations), Social Psychology (88 citations) and Conservation (10 citations). Moé Kishida has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Steriani Elavsky, Kamila Dvořáková, Mark T. Greenberg, Patricia C. Broderick, Linda Larkey, Jacqueline Mogle, Sunhye Bai, Scherezade K. Mama, Maricarmen Vizcaíno and Dara James. Their work appears in journals such as Mindfulness, Journal of American College Health, Health Psychology, Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society and Journal of Happiness Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.