M.O. Creighton

696 citations
21 papers · 590 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

M.O. Creighton

20 papers receiving 535 citations

Peers

M.O. Creighton
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Clinical Biochemistry 76
  • Biochemistry 64
  • Ophthalmology 78
  • Biophysics 51
  • Molecular Biology 355
Replace Janet P. McCready with:
Janet P. McCready United States
Jason T. Wong Canada
Vanita A. Padgaonkar United States
Peter A. Glascott United States
Bing-Fen Liu United States
Minakshi Joshi United States
Stéphanie Cabaret France
W H Tung United States
Javier Araiz Spain
Viola Kürten Germany
M.O. Creighton relative to Janet P. McCready United States Janet P. McCready's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Janet P. McCready · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M.O. Creighton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.O. Creighton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.O. Creighton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.O. Creighton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.O. Creighton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.O. Creighton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.O. Creighton. The network helps show where M.O. Creighton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside M.O. Creighton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M.O. Creighton Line = papers co-authored together M.O. Creighton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197974
2 198574
3 198360
4
Globular bodies: a primary cause of the opacity in senile and diabetic posterior cortical subcapsular cataracts?
197839
5 198338
6 197637
7 198335
8 197935
9 198334
10 197432
11 198128
12 198726
13 198520
14
Radiation cataractogenesis induced by neutron or gamma irradiation in the rat lens is reduced by vitamin E.
199019
15 198112
16 198211
17 19805
18 19964
19
51Cr release and oxidative stress in the lens.
19893
20 19812

About M.O. Creighton

M.O. Creighton is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ophthalmology, Cell Biology, Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 21 papers that have together received 590 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Connexins and lens biology (17 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (5 papers), Aldose Reductase and Taurine (4 papers), Biochemical effects in animals (3 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (2 papers), Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (2 papers), Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties (1 paper) and Microbial Inactivation Methods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (76 citations), Biochemistry (64 citations), Ophthalmology (78 citations), Biophysics (51 citations) and Molecular Biology (355 citations). M.O. Creighton has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Tanzania and United States. Frequent co-authors include John R. Trevithick, W. M. Ross, P.J. Stewart-DeHaan, W. R. Inch, Lars Erik Larsen, J.H. Jacobi, J. Baskerville, Ronald H. Bradley, H. Maisel and D. H. Percy. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Eye Research, Analytical Biochemistry, American Journal of Veterinary Research, Nature and Differentiation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact