M.M. Thwin

605 citations
16 papers · 512 · h-index 12

Impact in

  • Virology top 10%
    • Rabies epidemiology and control
  • Genetics top 10%
    • Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies

Papers in

    • Ion channel regulation and function 4
    • Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study 3
    • Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies 7

M.M. Thwin

16 papers receiving 487 citations

Peers

M.M. Thwin
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Virology 60
  • Genetics 267
  • Microbiology 52
  • Paleontology 56
  • Pharmacology 95
Replace Xingwen Su with:
Xingwen Su China
Yan Guang-mei China
Bingzheng Lu China
Yoshiyuki Sakaki Japan
Ilya Khaytin United States
Preeti M. Ismail Canada
R. Shipolini United Kingdom
Changcheng Song United States
John Bradsher United States
O. V. Kel Russia
M.M. Thwin relative to Xingwen Su China Xingwen Su's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Xingwen Su · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M.M. Thwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.M. Thwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.M. Thwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.M. Thwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.M. Thwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.M. Thwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.M. Thwin. The network helps show where M.M. Thwin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M.M. Thwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M.M. Thwin Line = papers co-authored together M.M. Thwin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2006108
2 199858
3 200356
4 200048
5 200546
6 200335
7 200234
8 200432
9 201031
10 200527
11 200716
12 200714
13 19974
14 19961
15 19951
16 20051

About M.M. Thwin

M.M. Thwin is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Pharmacology, Rheumatology and Cell Biology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 512 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies (7 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (4 papers), Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies (3 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (3 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (3 papers), Healthcare and Venom Research (3 papers), Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins (2 papers) and Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Virology (60 citations), Genetics (267 citations), Microbiology (52 citations), Paleontology (56 citations) and Pharmacology (95 citations). M.M. Thwin has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include P. Gopalakrishnakone, Ramar Perumal Samy, P. H. Yap, Bow Ho, A.A. Farooqui, Chee Wai Fong, Wei‐Yi Ong, R. Manjunatha Kini, Kandiah Jeyaseelan and Arunmozhiarasi Armugam. Their work appears in journals such as Toxicon, PLoS Genetics, Neuroscience, European Journal of Biochemistry and Experimental Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact