Mitchell W. Dul

565 citations
30 papers · 449 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Mitchell W. Dul

28 papers receiving 445 citations

Peers

Mitchell W. Dul
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Ophthalmology 331
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 231
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 182
  • Epidemiology 118
  • Sensory Systems 10
Replace Takahiro Niida with:
Takahiro Niida Japan
Faran Sabeti Australia
Evanne J. Casson Canada
Christine Timms United Kingdom
Itay Ben-Zion Israel
Nicholas A. Sala United States
Abhiram S. Vilupuru United States
Alec M. Ansons United Kingdom
Lixia Feng China
Florence Rigaudière France
Mitchell W. Dul relative to Takahiro Niida Japan Takahiro Niida's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Takahiro Niida · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell W. Dul

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell W. Dul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell W. Dul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell W. Dul more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell W. Dul

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell W. Dul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell W. Dul. The network helps show where Mitchell W. Dul may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mitchell W. Dul, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mitchell W. Dul Line = papers co-authored together Mitchell W. Dul links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200758
2 200843
3 200842
4 200635
5 201428
6 200626
7 201724
8 202321
9 201420
10 201920
11 201018
12 200815
13 200414
14 201312
15 202211
16 201311
17 198810
18 20169
19 20158
20 20097

About Mitchell W. Dul

Mitchell W. Dul is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology and Epidemiology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 449 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (19 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (17 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (7 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (7 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (4 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (3 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers) and Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (331 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (231 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (182 citations), Epidemiology (118 citations) and Sensory Systems (10 citations). Mitchell W. Dul has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Iran. Frequent co-authors include William H. Swanson, Harry J. Wyatt, Hao Sun, Douglas G. Horner, José‐Manuel Alonso, Jianzhong Jin, Victor E. Malinovsky, Fei Pan, Qasim Zaidi and Reece Mazade. Their work appears in journals such as Optometry and Vision Science, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Journal of Neuroscience, Vision Research and iScience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact