Mitchell Troy

2.4k citations
112 papers · 1.4k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Mitchell Troy

108 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Mitchell Troy
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Instrumentation 249
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.2k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 409
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 363
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 721
Replace Lisa Poyneer with:
Lisa Poyneer United States
Michael Lloyd‐Hart United States
David C. Redding United States
Emiliano Diolaiti Italy
Enrico Marchetti Germany
D. Scott Acton United States
Miska Le Louarn Germany
Rodolphe Conan Canada
John W Hardy United States
Jacopo Farinato Italy
Mitchell Troy relative to Lisa Poyneer United States Lisa Poyneer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Lisa Poyneer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell Troy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell Troy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell Troy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell Troy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell Troy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell Troy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell Troy. The network helps show where Mitchell Troy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mitchell Troy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mitchell Troy Line = papers co-authored together Mitchell Troy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 112 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000177
2 1998174
3 200070
4 200457
5 200153
6 201350
7 200447
8 199946
9 199943
10 200440
11 200934
12 200734
13 200326
14 200024
15 200822
16 200821
17 200618
18 200618
19 200417
20 200315

About Mitchell Troy

Mitchell Troy is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Instrumentation, having authored 112 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (98 papers), Optical Systems and Laser Technology (43 papers), Advanced optical system design (36 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (33 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (19 papers), Optical measurement and interference techniques (16 papers), Calibration and Measurement Techniques (11 papers) and Optical Wireless Communication Technologies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (249 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.2k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (409 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (363 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (721 citations). Mitchell Troy has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include G. A. Chanan, Catherine M. Ohara, Richard G. Dekany, Frank G. Dekens, Jerry E. Nelson, Terry S. Mast, E. E. Bloemhof, David Kirkman, Rebecca Oppenheimer and Fang Shi. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Applied Optics, Optics Letters, Icarus and Experimental Astronomy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact