Mitchell McMaster

15 papers receiving 291 citations

Peers

Mitchell McMaster
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 104
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 15
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 6
  • General Health Professions 54
  • Occupational Therapy 9
Replace Amy Streater with:
Amy Streater United Kingdom
Mateus Dias Antunes Brazil
Deborah Brooks Australia
Sandra Schüssler Austria
Rita Shapiro United States
Elnour E. Dafeeah Qatar
Jochen Werle Germany
Michio Maruta Japan
María Gómez-Gallego Spain
Gwanghee Han Japan
Mitchell McMaster relative to Amy Streater United Kingdom Amy Streater's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Amy Streater · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell McMaster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell McMaster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell McMaster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell McMaster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell McMaster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell McMaster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell McMaster. The network helps show where Mitchell McMaster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mitchell McMaster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mitchell McMaster Line = papers co-authored together Mitchell McMaster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 201672
2 202046
3 202031
4 201829
5 201724
6 201819
7 201818
8
Understanding pedestrian behaviour at railway level crossings: is there a need for more research?
201315
9 20219
10 20199
11 20158
12 20157
13 20196
14 20234
15
Outcome evaluation framework for the Queensland Alcohol Ignition Interlock Program. Report to Queensland Department of Transport and Main Roads (TMR 3814)
20141

About Mitchell McMaster

Mitchell McMaster is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 15 papers that have together received 298 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers), Traffic and Road Safety (3 papers), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (2 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (2 papers), Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (1 paper), Patient Dignity and Privacy (1 paper), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (1 paper) and Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (104 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (15 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (6 citations), General Health Professions (54 citations) and Occupational Therapy (9 citations). Mitchell McMaster has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Sarang Kim, Elaine Fielding, Susan J. Torres, Kaarin J. Anstey, Elizabeth Beattie, Catherine D’Este, Nicolas Cherbuin, Maria OʼReilly, Linda Clare and Margaret MacAndrew. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, International Psychogeriatrics, Aging & Mental Health, Clinical Interventions in Aging and Dementia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact