Mitchell Harwitz
Impact in
- Transportation top 5%
- Transportation Planning and Optimization
- Marketing top 10%
- Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Papers in
-
- Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing 5
-
- Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis 3
- Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets 2
- Economic Growth and Productivity 2
- Co-authors
- Herbert Mohring (1 shared paper)Subhash C. Narula (5 shared papers)Melville J. Herskovits (3 shared papers)Philip W. Porter (1 shared paper)Peter A. Rogerson (2 shared papers)Tony Edward Smith (2 shared papers)E. A. G. Robinson (1 shared paper)Phyllis M. Deane (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Papers of the Regional Science Association (3 papers)Journal of Regional Science (2 papers)Economic Geography (2 papers)Journal of Political Economy (1 paper)Geographical Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Mitchell Harwitz
13 papers receiving 197 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Transportation 81
- Marketing 39
- Economics and Econometrics 82
- Anthropology 26
- Strategy and Management 32
Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell Harwitz
This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell Harwitz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell Harwitz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell Harwitz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell Harwitz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell Harwitz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell Harwitz. The network helps show where Mitchell Harwitz may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Mitchell Harwitz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Highway Benefits: An Analytical Framework | 2012 | 96 |
| 2 | 1966 | 41 | |
| 3 | 1981 | 32 | |
| 4 | 1983 | 21 | |
| 5 | 1987 | 12 | |
| 6 | 1983 | 11 | |
| 7 | 1972 | 6 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 6 | |
| 9 | 1965 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1987 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2000 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1967 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1978 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1965 | 0 |
About Mitchell Harwitz
Mitchell Harwitz is a scholar working on Marketing, Economics and Econometrics, Transportation, Development and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 15 papers that have together received 247 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (5 papers), Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (3 papers), Transportation Planning and Optimization (3 papers), Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (2 papers), Urban and Freight Transport Logistics (2 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (2 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (2 papers) and International Development and Aid (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transportation (81 citations), Marketing (39 citations), Economics and Econometrics (82 citations), Anthropology (26 citations) and Strategy and Management (32 citations). Mitchell Harwitz has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Herbert Mohring, Subhash C. Narula, Melville J. Herskovits, Philip W. Porter, Peter A. Rogerson, Tony Edward Smith, E. A. G. Robinson, Phyllis M. Deane and ISAAC SCHAPERA. Their work appears in journals such as Papers of the Regional Science Association, Journal of Regional Science, Economic Geography, Journal of Political Economy and Geographical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.