Mita Banerjee

1.1k citations
35 papers · 570 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Mita Banerjee

29 papers receiving 504 citations

Peers

Mita Banerjee
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 261
  • Social Psychology 179
  • Clinical Psychology 165
  • Pharmacy 26
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 75
Replace Manuel Sprung with:
Manuel Sprung Austria
Carmen Belacchi Italy
Luke Williams United States
Marinella Majorano Italy
Lizet Ketelaar Netherlands
Adriano Pagnin Italy
Katerina Maridaki‐Kassotaki Greece
Evelien Dirks Netherlands
Liat Sayfan United States
Joann P. Benigno United States
Mita Banerjee relative to Manuel Sprung Austria Manuel Sprung's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Manuel Sprung · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mita Banerjee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mita Banerjee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mita Banerjee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mita Banerjee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mita Banerjee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mita Banerjee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mita Banerjee. The network helps show where Mita Banerjee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mita Banerjee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mita Banerjee Line = papers co-authored together Mita Banerjee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995152
2 1991139
3 199777
4 201674
5 202115
6 201614
7 201813
8 20169
9 20138
10 20207
11 20156
12
Preschoolers' understanding of emotion: Appearance-reality, display rules, and regulation strategies.
19925
13 20185
14 20085
15 20185
16 20194
17 20164
18 20213
19 20213
20 20252

About Mita Banerjee

Mita Banerjee is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Education, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 35 papers that have together received 570 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Empathy and Medical Education (4 papers), Race, History, and American Society (3 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (3 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (3 papers), Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (2 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (2 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (2 papers) and Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (261 citations), Social Psychology (179 citations), Clinical Psychology (165 citations), Pharmacy (26 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (75 citations). Mita Banerjee has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Henry M. Wellman, Paul L. Harris, Anna Sinclair, Norbert W. Paul, Manfred E. Beutel, Thomas Efferth, Jörg Wiltink, Eva M. Klein, Maria Blettner and Claus Jünger. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Transnational American Studies, Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, Journal of Aging Studies, South Asian Popular Culture and International Journal of Cardiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact