Minta Huang

938 citations
16 papers · 778 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Minta Huang

16 papers receiving 710 citations

Peers

Minta Huang
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Physiology 187
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 328
  • Molecular Biology 489
  • Physiology 150
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 28
Replace Carmen D. Lobatón with:
Carmen D. Lobatón Spain
George R. Ehring United States
Ruth A. Senter United States
John Krupinski United States
R. Theodore Fletcher United States
Stephanie L. Barrow United Kingdom
Kent A. Fagan United States
Robert M. Drummond United Kingdom
Tara Menon United States
María Teresa Alonso Spain
Minta Huang relative to Carmen D. Lobatón Spain Carmen D. Lobatón's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Carmen D. Lobatón · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Minta Huang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Minta Huang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Minta Huang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Minta Huang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Minta Huang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Minta Huang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Minta Huang. The network helps show where Minta Huang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Minta Huang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Minta Huang Line = papers co-authored together Minta Huang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1974132
2 1966116
3 197276
4 198367
5 198463
6 197957
7 197254
8 197646
9 197045
10 198735
11 198322
12 198319
13 197815
14 198914
15 198910
16 19887

About Minta Huang

Minta Huang is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Physiology and Surgery, having authored 16 papers that have together received 778 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (6 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (5 papers), Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (4 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (3 papers), Phosphodiesterase function and regulation (2 papers), Chemical Reactions and Isotopes (2 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (2 papers) and Cardiovascular, Neuropeptides, and Oxidative Stress Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (187 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (328 citations), Molecular Biology (489 citations), Physiology (150 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (28 citations). Minta Huang has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include John W. Daly, O.P. Rorstad, George I. Drummond, A.W. Linnane, G. D. Clark‐Walker, David R. Biggs, Hirotoshi Shimizu, F. Gibson, K. Lederis and David A. Hanley. Their work appears in journals such as Life Sciences, Journal of Neurochemistry, Biochemical Pharmacology, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Peptides.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact