Minna Stolt

140 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Minna Stolt's Hit Papers

Moral injury in healthcare professionals: A scoping review and discussion 2021 · 218 citations
2180+1+3Years since publication50100150200

Peers

Minna Stolt
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Research and Theory 221
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 89
  • General Health Professions 1.5k
  • Occupational Therapy 240
  • Leadership and Management 72
Replace Senga Bond with:
Senga Bond United Kingdom
Joakim Öhlén Sweden
Karen Spilsbury United Kingdom
Linda H. Yoder United States
Daphne Stannard United States
Kerstin Segesten Sweden
Adelaida Zabalegui Spain
Elizabeth R. Lenz United States
Bridie Kent United Kingdom
Annelie J. Sundler Sweden
Minna Stolt relative to Senga Bond United Kingdom Senga Bond's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16.5×
Senga Bond · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Minna Stolt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Minna Stolt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Minna Stolt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Minna Stolt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Minna Stolt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Minna Stolt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Minna Stolt. The network helps show where Minna Stolt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Minna Stolt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Minna Stolt Line = papers co-authored together Minna Stolt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 151 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Moral injury in healthcare professionals: A scoping review and discussion
Hit paper breakdown →
2021218
2 2009148
3 2018104
4 2015101
5 201488
6 201483
7 201971
8 202069
9 201166
10 202060
11 201456
12 201453
13 201251
14 201750
15 201849
16 201846
17 201945
18 201345
19 201944
20 202040

About Minna Stolt

Minna Stolt is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Occupational Therapy, having authored 151 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (36 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (27 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (22 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (22 papers), Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (20 papers), Ethics in medical practice (18 papers), Foot and Ankle Surgery (16 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (221 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (89 citations), General Health Professions (1.5k citations), Occupational Therapy (240 citations) and Leadership and Management (72 citations). Minna Stolt has collaborated with scholars based in Finland, Sweden and Cyprus. Frequent co-authors include Riitta Suhonen, Helena Leino‐Kilpi, Leena Salminen, P. Anne Scott, Jouko Katajisto, Anto Čartolovni, Mikko Saarikoski, Andreas Charalambous, Arja Suikkala and Heli Vaartio. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Nursing, Nursing Ethics, Nurse Education Today, International Journal of Older People Nursing and Journal of Advanced Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact