Ming‐Fu Lin

2.7k citations
54 papers · 1.1k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Ming‐Fu Lin

51 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Ming‐Fu Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Structural Biology 74
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 221
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 590
  • Spectroscopy 268
  • Radiation 115
Replace Markus Gühr with:
Markus Gühr Germany
C. P. Schulz Germany
Jaroslav Kočišek Czechia
Johan Söderström Sweden
A. Lübcke Germany
A. A. Ischenko Russia
Inga Jordan Switzerland
R. Weber Germany
Christian Frischkorn Germany
Kenneth A. Lopata United States
Ming‐Fu Lin relative to Markus Gühr Germany Markus Gühr's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Markus Gühr · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming‐Fu Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming‐Fu Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming‐Fu Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming‐Fu Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming‐Fu Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming‐Fu Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming‐Fu Lin. The network helps show where Ming‐Fu Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming‐Fu Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming‐Fu Lin Line = papers co-authored together Ming‐Fu Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200784
2 200766
3 201757
4 202153
5 201948
6 200544
7 202344
8 200743
9 200541
10 202040
11 201937
12 201837
13 201635
14 202131
15 201730
16 201227
17 200627
18 201425
19 200423
20 202122

About Ming‐Fu Lin

Ming‐Fu Lin is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy, Radiation, Structural Biology and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 54 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (18 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (13 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (11 papers), Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (8 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (8 papers), Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques (8 papers) and Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Structural Biology (74 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (221 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (590 citations), Spectroscopy (268 citations) and Radiation (115 citations). Ming‐Fu Lin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Chi‐Kung Ni, Yuan T. Lee, Chien‐Ming Tseng, Yuri A. Dyakov, M. C. Lin, Xijie Wang, Josh Vura‐Weis, Stephen R. Leone, Daniel M. Neumark and Shucheng Xu. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Nature Communications, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, Structural Dynamics and Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact