Ming‐Der Wu
Impact in
- Biotechnology top 2%
- Microbial Metabolism and Applications
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
- Fungal Biology and Applications
- Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds
- Phytochemistry and Bioactivity Studies
Papers in
- Pharmacology 61
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis 51
- Fungal Biology and Applications 38
- Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds 10
-
- Microbial Metabolism and Applications 27
- Marine Sponges and Natural Products 8
- Co-authors
- Ming‐Jen Cheng (71 shared papers)Gwo‐Fang Yuan (30 shared papers)Ih‐Sheng Chen (21 shared papers)Yao‐Haur Kuo (7 shared papers)Li‐Ming Yang Kuo (4 shared papers)Chi Wi Ong (4 shared papers)Sung‐Yuan Hsieh (17 shared papers)Yen-Lin Chen (13 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Ming‐Der Wu
77 papers receiving 894 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Biotechnology 339
- Pharmacology 445
- Pharmacology 172
- Biochemistry 69
- Complementary and alternative medicine 71
Countries citing papers authored by Ming‐Der Wu
This map shows the geographic impact of Ming‐Der Wu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming‐Der Wu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming‐Der Wu more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ming‐Der Wu
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming‐Der Wu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming‐Der Wu. The network helps show where Ming‐Der Wu may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming‐Der Wu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 79 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 75 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 69 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 60 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 45 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 26 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 26 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 26 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 24 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 24 | |
| 11 | 1974 | 22 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 19 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 19 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 18 | |
| 15 | 2000 | 17 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 17 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 16 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 16 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 15 | |
| 20 | 1970 | 15 |
About Ming‐Der Wu
Ming‐Der Wu is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Biotechnology, Pharmacology, Molecular Biology and Organic Chemistry, having authored 82 papers that have together received 921 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (51 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (38 papers), Microbial Metabolism and Applications (27 papers), Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (10 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (9 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (8 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (7 papers) and Plant-derived Lignans Synthesis and Bioactivity (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (339 citations), Pharmacology (445 citations), Pharmacology (172 citations), Biochemistry (69 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (71 citations). Ming‐Der Wu has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Thailand and Myanmar. Frequent co-authors include Ming‐Jen Cheng, Gwo‐Fang Yuan, Ih‐Sheng Chen, Yao‐Haur Kuo, Li‐Ming Yang Kuo, Chi Wi Ong, Sung‐Yuan Hsieh, Yen-Lin Chen, Ray‐Ling Huang and Jih‐Jung Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Phytochemistry Letters, Molecules, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, Chemistry & Biodiversity and Journal of Natural Products.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.