Ming Tie

607 citations
35 papers · 437 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Ming Tie

34 papers receiving 429 citations

Peers

Ming Tie
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 220
  • Mathematical Physics 30
  • Automotive Engineering 30
  • Artificial Intelligence 85
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 29
Replace Zhenda Hu with:
Zhenda Hu China
Fangxun Bao China
Ebrahim Sharifi Tashnizi Iran
Yingying Ma China
Qiang Sun Canada
L. A. Beklaryan Russia
Daqing Wu China
M. Rickert United States
Abdeslem Boukhtouta Canada
Ming Tie relative to Zhenda Hu China Zhenda Hu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.5×
Zhenda Hu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming Tie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming Tie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming Tie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming Tie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming Tie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming Tie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming Tie. The network helps show where Ming Tie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming Tie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming Tie Line = papers co-authored together Ming Tie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202281
2 201957
3 202251
4 202233
5 202125
6 202122
7 202218
8 201816
9 202114
10 202113
11 202211
12 202310
13 202210
14 20219
15 20228
16 20238
17 20058
18 20236
19 20226
20 20215

About Ming Tie

Ming Tie is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Control and Systems Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Artificial Intelligence and Automotive Engineering, having authored 35 papers that have together received 437 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption (7 papers), Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques (6 papers), Fault Detection and Control Systems (5 papers), Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems (4 papers), Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems (3 papers), AI in cancer detection (3 papers), Digital Media Forensic Detection (3 papers) and Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (220 citations), Mathematical Physics (30 citations), Automotive Engineering (30 citations), Artificial Intelligence (85 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (29 citations). Ming Tie has collaborated with scholars based in China, New Zealand and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Chong Fu, Wei Song, Yu Zheng, Chiu‐Wing Sham, Junxin Chen, Jun Liu, Ye Qi, Qijiao Song, Lin Cao and Yunlong Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Neural Computing and Applications, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D Journal of Automobile Engineering, Journal of Computational Physics, Resources Conservation and Recycling and Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact