Miles Groth

493 citations
22 papers · 265 · h-index 5

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 5%
    • Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
    • Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity
    • Mental Health and Psychiatry
    • Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
    • Philosophy and Theoretical Science

Papers in

Miles Groth

16 papers receiving 185 citations

Peers

Miles Groth
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Philosophy 88
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 88
  • History and Philosophy of Science 23
  • General Psychology 4
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 41
Replace Renaud Barbaras with:
Renaud Barbaras France
Shigenori Nagatomo United States
Nicholas F. Gier United States
HUGH T. BREDIN United Kingdom
Claude-Pierre Pérez France
Clare Carlisle Brazil
Mark B. Okrent United States
Amy M. Schmitter Canada
荘子
Jordynn Jack United States
Miles Groth relative to Renaud Barbaras France Renaud Barbaras's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.3×
Renaud Barbaras · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Miles Groth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Miles Groth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Miles Groth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Miles Groth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Miles Groth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Miles Groth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Miles Groth. The network helps show where Miles Groth may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Ontology: The Hermeneutics of Facticity
2000111
2
Thing and Space: Lectures of 1907
199993
3
The Essence of Truth: On Plato’s Cave Allegory and Theaetetus
200516
4 199710
5 20079
6
Seeing the Self: Heidegger on Subjectivity
20004
7 20173
8 20113
9 19993
10
Naughty Boys. Anti-Social Behaviour, ADHD and the Role of Culture
20073
11
Smart Classrooms Cannot Replace Remarkable Professors.
20072
12 20072
13 20161
14
ARTE Y VACÍO: ESPACIO Y LUGAR EN HEIDEGGER Y CHILLIDA
20181
15 20191
16 20011
17 20001
18 20001
19 20020
20 20080

About Miles Groth

Miles Groth is a scholar working on Philosophy, Literature and Literary Theory, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Gender Studies and Clinical Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 265 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (3 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (2 papers), Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research (1 paper), Philosophical and Cultural Analysis (1 paper), Child Therapy and Development (1 paper) and Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (88 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (88 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (23 citations), General Psychology (4 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (41 citations). Miles Groth has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Their work appears in journals such as Psychoanalytic Psychology, ˜The œreview of metaphysics, International Philosophical Quarterly, International Journal of Men s Health and The Humanistic Psychologist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact