Miles Groth
Impact in
-
- Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Philosophy top 5%
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
- Philosophy and Historical Thought
Papers in
-
- Philosophical and Cultural Analysis 1
- Journals
- Psychoanalytic Psychology (2 papers)The review of metaphysics (4 papers)International Philosophical Quarterly (1 paper)International Journal of Men s Health (1 paper)The Humanistic Psychologist (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Miles Groth
15 papers receiving 169 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 76
- Philosophy 63
- General Psychology 4
- History and Philosophy of Science 10
- Cognitive Neuroscience 35
Countries citing papers authored by Miles Groth
This map shows the geographic impact of Miles Groth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Miles Groth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Miles Groth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Miles Groth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Miles Groth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Miles Groth. The network helps show where Miles Groth may publish in the future.
No co-authors to show.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thing and Space: Lectures of 1907 | 1999 | 83 |
| 2 | Ontology: The Hermeneutics of Facticity | 2000 | 64 |
| 3 | The Essence of Truth: On Plato’s Cave Allegory and Theaetetus | 2005 | 14 |
| 4 | 2007 | 9 | |
| 5 | 1997 | 9 | |
| 6 | Seeing the Self: Heidegger on Subjectivity | 2000 | 4 |
| 7 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 3 | |
| 9 | Naughty Boys. Anti-Social Behaviour, ADHD and the Role of Culture | 2007 | 3 |
| 10 | Smart Classrooms Cannot Replace Remarkable Professors. | 2007 | 2 |
| 11 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1999 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2002 | 1 | |
| 15 | ARTE Y VACÍO: ESPACIO Y LUGAR EN HEIDEGGER Y CHILLIDA | 2018 | 1 |
| 16 | 2000 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2000 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1996 | 0 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2008 | 0 |
About Miles Groth
Miles Groth is a scholar working on Philosophy, Literature and Literary Theory, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Gender Studies and Clinical Psychology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 203 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Roles and Identity Studies (2 papers), Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (2 papers), Galician and Iberian cultural studies (1 paper), Classical Antiquity Studies (1 paper), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (1 paper), Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (1 paper), Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research (1 paper) and Philosophical and Cultural Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (76 citations), Philosophy (63 citations), General Psychology (4 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (10 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (35 citations). Miles Groth has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Their work appears in journals such as Psychoanalytic Psychology, The review of metaphysics, International Philosophical Quarterly, International Journal of Men s Health and The Humanistic Psychologist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.