Miklós Bitay

876 citations
13 papers · 547 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Miklós Bitay

13 papers receiving 539 citations

Peers

Miklós Bitay
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 470
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 125
  • Molecular Biology 337
  • Electrochemistry 26
  • Biophysics 6
Replace Csaba Lengyel with:
Csaba Lengyel Hungary
Nidas A. Undrovinas United States
MA Vos Netherlands
Eva Rasenack Germany
Judith M.B. Pinto United States
Jurren M. van Opstal Netherlands
Xiaojuan Xu Japan
S Koumi United States
Ismail Adeniran United Kingdom
Roel L. H. M. G. Spätjens Netherlands
Miklós Bitay relative to Csaba Lengyel Hungary Csaba Lengyel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Csaba Lengyel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Miklós Bitay

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Miklós Bitay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Miklós Bitay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Miklós Bitay more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Miklós Bitay

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Miklós Bitay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Miklós Bitay. The network helps show where Miklós Bitay may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Miklós Bitay, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Miklós Bitay Line = papers co-authored together Miklós Bitay links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2005288
2 200979
3 201143
4 200837
5 200929
6 201324
7 201018
8 20209
9 20218
10 20225
11 20194
12 20132
13 20241

About Miklós Bitay

Miklós Bitay is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Surgery, having authored 13 papers that have together received 547 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (10 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (5 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper), Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (1 paper), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (1 paper), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (1 paper) and Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (470 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (125 citations), Molecular Biology (337 citations), Electrochemistry (26 citations) and Biophysics (6 citations). Miklós Bitay has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, Italy and Germany. Frequent co-authors include András Varró, Julius Gy. Papp, Gábor Bogáts, Norbert Jost, László Virág, J. Takács, Csaba Lengyel, Péter Biliczki, David A. Lathrop and Z.P. Nagy. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, Circulation, Basic Research in Cardiology, Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine and British Journal of Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact