Mike Keesman

663 citations
15 papers · 470 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Mike Keesman

15 papers receiving 449 citations

Peers

Mike Keesman
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Applied Psychology 124
  • Sensory Systems 49
  • Clinical Psychology 199
  • General Decision Sciences 12
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 84
Replace Maisy Best with:
Maisy Best United Kingdom
Anna Richard Austria
Marjorie L. Prokosch United States
Oh‐Ryeong Ha United States
Janneke C.A.H. Giesen Netherlands
Valentin Flaudias France
Georg Halbeisen Germany
Andrew B. Geier United States
Jill North United States
Helen K. Ruddock United Kingdom
Mike Keesman relative to Maisy Best United Kingdom Maisy Best's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.5×
Maisy Best · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mike Keesman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mike Keesman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mike Keesman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mike Keesman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mike Keesman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mike Keesman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mike Keesman. The network helps show where Mike Keesman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mike Keesman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mike Keesman Line = papers co-authored together Mike Keesman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2014156
2 2013113
3 201665
4 202025
5 201724
6 201719
7 201917
8 201815
9 202114
10 201610
11 20237
12 20182
13 20211
14 20231
15 20241

About Mike Keesman

Mike Keesman is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems, Applied Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 15 papers that have together received 470 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (6 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (1 paper) and Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (124 citations), Sensory Systems (49 citations), Clinical Psychology (199 citations), General Decision Sciences (12 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (84 citations). Mike Keesman has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Esther Katharina Papies, Tila Pronk, Lawrence W. Barsalou, Henk Aarts, Guido M. van Koningsbruggen, Michael R. Hafner, Roderik A. Kraaijenhagen, Andrea W.M. Evers, Douwe E. Atsma and Veronica R. Janssen. Their work appears in journals such as Appetite, Behavior Therapy, Mindfulness, International Journal of Medical Informatics and Current Addiction Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact