Mie Sato

755 citations
60 papers · 575 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Mie Sato

46 papers receiving 536 citations

Peers

Mie Sato
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 104
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 312
  • Human-Computer Interaction 42
  • Biophysics 38
  • Structural Biology 7
Replace Felix Ritter with:
Felix Ritter Germany
Yoichi Miyake Japan
Adam W. Harley United States
Delphine Nain United States
Antônio Wilson Vieira Brazil
Lin Zheng China
Arie Kaufman United States
Satoshi Iizuka Japan
Satoshi Tanaka Japan
Mie Sato relative to Felix Ritter Germany Felix Ritter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Felix Ritter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mie Sato

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mie Sato's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mie Sato with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mie Sato more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mie Sato

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mie Sato. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mie Sato. The network helps show where Mie Sato may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mie Sato, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mie Sato Line = papers co-authored together Mie Sato links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001205
2 200278
3 200043
4 200239
5 200029
6 200227
7 199725
8 201514
9 201713
10 201412
11 200111
12 20168
13 20216
14 20164
15 20064
16 20064
17 20213
18 20203
19 19993
20 20103

About Mie Sato

Mie Sato is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Human-Computer Interaction, Social Psychology, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 60 papers that have together received 575 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Interactive and Immersive Displays (11 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (10 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (10 papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (9 papers), Color perception and design (8 papers), Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies (8 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (7 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (104 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (312 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (42 citations), Biophysics (38 citations) and Structural Biology (7 citations). Mie Sato has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Arie Kaufman, Ingmar Bitter, Michael A. Bender, M. Nakajima, Ming Wan, Sarang Lakare, Ming Wan, Kevin T. McDonnell, Atsushi Ito and Fumihiro Satō. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of The Institute of Image Information and Television Engineers, Photochemistry and Photobiology, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Lecture notes in computer science and International Journal of Biometrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact