Mick Smith

1.4k citations
60 papers · 997 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Mick Smith

53 papers receiving 848 citations

Peers

Mick Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Geography, Planning and Development 344
  • Sociology and Political Science 505
  • Urban Studies 50
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 91
  • Cultural Studies 61
Replace Deborah Dixon with:
Deborah Dixon United Kingdom
Laklak Burarrwanga Australia
Bawaka Country Australia
Patrick D. Murphy United States
Natasha Myers Canada
Paul Rodaway United Kingdom
Banbapuy Ganambarr Australia
Ritjilili Ganambarr Australia
Djawundil Maymuru Australia
John-David C Dewsbury United States
Mick Smith relative to Deborah Dixon United Kingdom Deborah Dixon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Deborah Dixon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mick Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mick Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mick Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mick Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mick Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mick Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mick Smith. The network helps show where Mick Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Mick Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mick Smith Line = papers co-authored together Mick Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009213
2 2005165
3 201060
4 200956
5 201349
6 200632
7 201229
8 200128
9
Geography and emotion - emerging constellations
200923
10 200820
11 199919
12 199718
13 201118
14
The 'Ethical' Space of the Abattoir: On the (In)human(e) Slaughter of Other Animals
200218
15 200117
16
An ethics of place
200116
17 200315
18 200914
19 199912
20 201112

About Mick Smith

Mick Smith is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Geography, Planning and Development, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Philosophy and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 60 papers that have together received 997 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geographies of human-animal interactions (12 papers), Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (7 papers), Political Theology and Sovereignty (5 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (4 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (3 papers), Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (3 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (3 papers) and Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (344 citations), Sociology and Political Science (505 citations), Urban Studies (50 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (91 citations) and Cultural Studies (61 citations). Mick Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Bangladesh. Frequent co-authors include Joyce Davidson, Liz Bondi, Elspeth Probyn, Victoria L. Henderson, Alex Law and Rosaleen Duffy. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Ethics, Environmental Politics, Environmental Values, Emotion, space and society and Ethics Place & Environment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact