Michelle Pollock
Impact in
-
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Health Informatics top 10%
Papers in
-
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews 5
- Reliability and Agreement in Measurement 1
-
- Health Policy Implementation Science 1
- Co-authors
- Lisa Hartling (10 shared papers)Ricardo M. Fernandes (7 shared papers)Michelle Gates (3 shared papers)Allison Gates (3 shared papers)Andrea C. Tricco (5 shared papers)Dawid Pieper (3 shared papers)Shannon D. Scott (3 shared papers)Robin Featherstone (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Systematic Reviews (7 papers)Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (2 papers)BMJ Open (1 paper)BMC Medical Research Methodology (1 paper)BMJ (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaPortugalUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Michelle Pollock
12 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Michelle Pollock's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 188
- Health Informatics 11
- Complementary and Manual Therapy 12
- Family Practice 8
- General Health Professions 108
Countries citing papers authored by Michelle Pollock
This map shows the geographic impact of Michelle Pollock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michelle Pollock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michelle Pollock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michelle Pollock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michelle Pollock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michelle Pollock. The network helps show where Michelle Pollock may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michelle Pollock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 447 |
| 2 | 2016 | 155 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 144 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 82 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 75 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 70 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 30 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2025 | 0 |
About Michelle Pollock
Michelle Pollock is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 13 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (5 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper) and Reliability and Agreement in Measurement (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (188 citations), Health Informatics (11 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (12 citations), Family Practice (8 citations) and General Health Professions (108 citations). Michelle Pollock has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Portugal and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Lisa Hartling, Ricardo M. Fernandes, Michelle Gates, Allison Gates, Andrea C. Tricco, Dawid Pieper, Shannon D. Scott, Robin Featherstone, Lorne A Becker and David Moher. Their work appears in journals such as Systematic Reviews, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, BMJ Open, BMC Medical Research Methodology and BMJ.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.