Michelle M. Wright

1.3k citations
22 papers · 323 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Michelle M. Wright

18 papers receiving 227 citations

Peers

Michelle M. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Cultural Studies 71
  • Literature and Literary Theory 68
  • Music 19
  • Anthropology 45
  • Gender Studies 41
Replace Kobena Mercer with:
Kobena Mercer United States
Debra Spitulnik United States
Ali Behdad United States
Brent Hayes Edwards United States
Coco Fusco United States
Serguei Alex. Oushakine United States
Bart Moore‐Gilbert United Kingdom
John C. Hawley United States
Sabine von Dirke United States
Zora Neale Hurston
Michelle M. Wright relative to Kobena Mercer United States Kobena Mercer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Kobena Mercer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michelle M. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michelle M. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michelle M. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michelle M. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michelle M. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michelle M. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michelle M. Wright. The network helps show where Michelle M. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Michelle M. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michelle M. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Michelle M. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015105
2
Physics of Blackness: Beyond the Middle Passage Epistemology
201556
3 200452
4
Domain Errors! Cyberfeminist Practices
200332
5 200518
6 200314
7
Blackness and sexualities
200711
8 20109
9 20126
10 20044
11 20202
12 19832
13 20092
14 19992
15 20202
16 20042
17 20191
18
Racism, Technology, and the Limits of Western Knowledge
20031
19 20061
20 20201

About Michelle M. Wright

Michelle M. Wright is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations and Communication, having authored 22 papers that have together received 323 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include German Colonialism and Identity Studies (4 papers), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (3 papers), European history and politics (2 papers), Race, History, and American Society (2 papers), African history and culture studies (2 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (1 paper), Social Media and Politics (1 paper) and Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Agriculture (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (71 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (68 citations), Music (19 citations), Anthropology (45 citations) and Gender Studies (41 citations). Michelle M. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Philippines and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tina M. Campt. Their work appears in journals such as Callaloo, International Affairs, African and Black Diaspora An International Journal, Transforming Anthropology and African American Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact