Michelle M. Wright

1.4k citations
26 papers · 446 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Michelle M. Wright

20 papers receiving 268 citations

Peers

Michelle M. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Cultural Studies 105
  • Literature and Literary Theory 109
  • Music 28
  • Anthropology 77
  • Gender Studies 52
Replace Tina M. Campt with:
Tina M. Campt United States
Debra Spitulnik United States
Michael Hanchard United States
José Eduardo Limón United States
Ali Behdad United States
José David Saldívar United States
Bart Moore‐Gilbert United Kingdom
Steven George Salaita Egypt
Alberto Moreiras United States
Coco Fusco United States
Michelle M. Wright relative to Tina M. Campt United States Tina M. Campt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Tina M. Campt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michelle M. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michelle M. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michelle M. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michelle M. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michelle M. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michelle M. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michelle M. Wright. The network helps show where Michelle M. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Michelle M. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michelle M. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Michelle M. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010144
2 200486
3
Physics of Blackness: Beyond the Middle Passage Epistemology
201563
4
Domain Errors! Cyberfeminist Practices
200335
5 200332
6 200521
7
Blackness and sexualities
200714
8 20129
9 20109
10 20136
11 20045
12 20093
13 20203
14 20203
15 19832
16 19992
17 20042
18 20191
19
Racism and Technology
20011
20 20061

About Michelle M. Wright

Michelle M. Wright is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Anthropology, Sociology and Political Science, Demography and General Psychology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 446 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Race, History, and American Society (4 papers), German Colonialism and Identity Studies (4 papers), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (4 papers), African history and culture studies (2 papers), European history and politics (2 papers), Diaspora, migration, transnational identity (2 papers), Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Agriculture (1 paper) and Social Media and Politics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (105 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (109 citations), Music (28 citations), Anthropology (77 citations) and Gender Studies (52 citations). Michelle M. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include Tina M. Campt. Their work appears in journals such as Callaloo, African American Review, American Literary History, International Affairs and The Black Scholar.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact