Michaela Diercke

2.2k citations
45 papers · 800 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Michaela Diercke

42 papers receiving 779 citations

Peers

Michaela Diercke
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Modeling and Simulation 129
  • Infectious Diseases 189
  • Health 53
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 12
  • Clinical Psychology 96
Replace Rehab El-Sokkary with:
Rehab El-Sokkary Egypt
Iman Ridda Australia
Mohamud Sheek‐Hussein United Arab Emirates
Davide Mangioni Italy
Annie Sparrow United States
Maysoon Dahab United Kingdom
Mei-Chuan Hung Taiwan
Matthew Zahn United States
Faryal Khamis Oman
Hani Jokhdar Saudi Arabia
Michaela Diercke relative to Rehab El-Sokkary Egypt Rehab El-Sokkary's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Rehab El-Sokkary · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michaela Diercke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michaela Diercke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michaela Diercke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michaela Diercke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michaela Diercke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michaela Diercke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michaela Diercke. The network helps show where Michaela Diercke may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michaela Diercke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michaela Diercke Line = papers co-authored together Michaela Diercke links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2021132
2 2020111
3 202175
4 202256
5 202151
6 201036
7 202035
8 202134
9 202126
10 202024
11 201321
12 202118
13 202018
14 202017
15 202210
16 201510
17 202010
18 20159
19 20189
20 20209

About Michaela Diercke

Michaela Diercke is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Modeling and Simulation, Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology and Immunology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 800 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health and Medical Studies (13 papers), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (11 papers), Immune responses and vaccinations (7 papers), Data-Driven Disease Surveillance (4 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (4 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers), Medical and Health Sciences Research (3 papers) and Hepatitis B Virus Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (129 citations), Infectious Diseases (189 citations), Health (53 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (12 citations) and Clinical Psychology (96 citations). Michaela Diercke has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Sweden and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Jens Hoebel, Niels Michalski, Osamah Hamouda, Morten Wahrendorf, Alexander Ullrich, Enno Nowossadeck, Benjamin Wachtler, Ute Rexroth, Silke Buda and Claudia Hövener. Their work appears in journals such as Eurosurveillance, Epidemiology and Infection, PLoS ONE, International Journal of Infectious Diseases and International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact