Michaela Andělová

33 papers receiving 595 citations

Peers

Michaela Andělová
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 331
  • Neurology 52
  • Neurology 75
  • Developmental Neuroscience 17
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 59
Replace Viola Biberacher with:
Viola Biberacher Germany
Tiziana Carandini Italy
Annalisa Colombi Italy
Joana Guimarães Portugal
Kichang Kwak South Korea
Angela Pisani Italy
M Wallner-Blazek Austria
Johanna Krüger Finland
Sara Collorone United Kingdom
Jean‐Baptiste Chanson France
Michaela Andělová relative to Viola Biberacher Germany Viola Biberacher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Viola Biberacher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michaela Andělová

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michaela Andělová's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michaela Andělová with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michaela Andělová more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michaela Andělová

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michaela Andělová. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michaela Andělová. The network helps show where Michaela Andělová may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michaela Andělová, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michaela Andělová Line = papers co-authored together Michaela Andělová links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201473
2 201753
3 201651
4 202049
5 201343
6 201832
7 201430
8 201927
9 201925
10 201421
11 202021
12 201518
13 202217
14 201916
15 201615
16 201914
17 201613
18 201911
19 201811
20 20149

About Michaela Andělová

Michaela Andělová is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Psychiatry and Mental health and Neurology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 601 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (24 papers), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (2 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (2 papers), Voice and Speech Disorders (2 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers) and RNA regulation and disease (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (331 citations), Neurology (52 citations), Neurology (75 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (17 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (59 citations). Michaela Andělová has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Czechia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Till Sprenger, Ludwig Kappos, Tomáš Uher, Christoph Stippich, Dana Horáková, Yvonne Naegelin, Michael Amann, Manuela Vaněčková, Stefano Magon and Ernst‐Wilhelm Radue. Their work appears in journals such as Multiple Sclerosis Journal, Neurology, Journal of Neurology, NeuroImage Clinical and Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact