M Wallner-Blazek

20 papers receiving 966 citations

Peers

M Wallner-Blazek
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 550
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 178
  • Neurology 84
  • Neurology 117
  • Sensory Systems 35
Replace Joana Guimarães with:
Joana Guimarães Portugal
Lucy Matthews United Kingdom
Mark Gudesblatt United States
Anna M. Pietroboni Italy
Angela Pisani Italy
Janina Behrens Germany
Kazutaka Sugimoto Japan
Leonello Guidi Italy
Zeenat Jaisani United States
Stig P. Cramer Denmark
M Wallner-Blazek relative to Joana Guimarães Portugal Joana Guimarães's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Joana Guimarães · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M Wallner-Blazek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M Wallner-Blazek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M Wallner-Blazek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M Wallner-Blazek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M Wallner-Blazek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M Wallner-Blazek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M Wallner-Blazek. The network helps show where M Wallner-Blazek may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M Wallner-Blazek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M Wallner-Blazek Line = papers co-authored together M Wallner-Blazek links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2011106
2 2009100
3 201178
4 201273
5 201068
6 201065
7 201162
8 201060
9 201357
10 201155
11 200950
12 201034
13 201034
14 201031
15 200928
16 201025
17 200817
18 201117
19 201311
20 20129

About M Wallner-Blazek

M Wallner-Blazek is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 20 papers that have together received 980 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (12 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (5 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (1 paper), Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases (1 paper), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (1 paper), CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (1 paper) and Polyomavirus and related diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (550 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (178 citations), Neurology (84 citations), Neurology (117 citations) and Sensory Systems (35 citations). M Wallner-Blazek has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United Kingdom and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Franz Fazekas, Christian Enzinger, Stefan Ropele, Siegrid Fuchs, Michael Khalil, Christian Langkammer, Margit Jehna, Marisa Loitfelder, Reinhold Schmidt and Gerhard Bachmaier. Their work appears in journals such as Multiple Sclerosis Journal, European Journal of Neurology, Neurology, Cephalalgia and Journal of NeuroVirology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact