Michael Wright

17 papers receiving 416 citations

Peers

Michael Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Health 91
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 143
  • Clinical Psychology 87
  • Nephrology 25
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 56
Replace Nicole R. Amoyal with:
Nicole R. Amoyal United States
Enver Roshi Albania
Jari Ahvenainen Finland
K Semenya United States
Lynden Crowshoe Canada
T H Tulchinsky Israel
M Nargundkar Canada
Regitze Kuhr Skals Denmark
Alison Worth United Kingdom
Michael Wright relative to Nicole R. Amoyal United States Nicole R. Amoyal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Nicole R. Amoyal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Wright. The network helps show where Michael Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Wright Line = papers co-authored together Michael Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 201099
2 200285
3 201874
4
Transitions in End of Life Care: Hospice and Related Developments in Eastern Europe and Central Asia
200343
5 200135
6 198834
7
Hospice and Palliative Care in Southeast Asia: A review of developments and challenges in Malaysia, Thailand and the Philippines
201025
8 200622
9
IDAP--five-year results.
19738
10 20096
11 20036
12 20154
13 20144
14 20044
15 20092
16 20241
17 20171

About Michael Wright

Michael Wright is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science, Health, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 17 papers that have together received 453 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (5 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (4 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (2 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers), ECG Monitoring and Analysis (2 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper), Global Health Care Issues (1 paper) and Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (91 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (143 citations), Clinical Psychology (87 citations), Nephrology (25 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (56 citations). Michael Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include David Clark, Michael H. Criqui, Christina L. Wassel, Steven A. Brody, Matthew Allison, Nicole E. Jensky, Mélanie Henderson, Anne‐Sophie Brazeau, Elham Rahme and Deborah Da Costa. Their work appears in journals such as Palliative Medicine, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Blood, Journal of Medical Internet Research and Contemporary Nurse.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact