Michael Williams

18 papers receiving 241 citations

Peers

Michael Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 31
  • Medical Terminology 2
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 35
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 63
  • Artificial Intelligence 44
Replace Bryant Lin with:
Bryant Lin United States
Min Jeong Kim South Korea
Nikki Marinsek United States
Thomas Zueger Switzerland
A. Pagliaro Italy
Dong Wook Kim South Korea
Gail Grant United States
Justin Y. Lee United States
Abdullah H. Alreedy Saudi Arabia
Michael Williams relative to Bryant Lin United States Bryant Lin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Bryant Lin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Williams. The network helps show where Michael Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Williams Line = papers co-authored together Michael Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200165
2 200343
3 201831
4 200327
5 201121
6 200613
7 201810
8 201010
9 20177
10 20044
11 20033
12 20203
13 20242
14 20172
15 20192
16 20122
17 20031
18 19701
19 20230
20 20240

About Michael Williams

Michael Williams is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery, General Health Professions, Hematology and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, having authored 21 papers that have together received 247 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sports Performance and Training (3 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (3 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (2 papers), Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (2 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (2 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (2 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (1 paper) and Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (31 citations), Medical Terminology (2 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (35 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (63 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (44 citations). Michael Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include William M. Kantor, Bebe Loff, Dev Kevat, Neil Gibson, Chris Easton, James Brouner, Ukadike C. Ugbolue, Joyce A. Wahr, Francis D. Pagani and Fred Morady. Their work appears in journals such as The Medical Journal of Australia, Current Opinion in Pharmacology, Neurosurgery, The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research and Transactions of the American Mathematical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact