Michael Williams

19 papers receiving 246 citations

Peers

Michael Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 32
  • Medical Terminology 1
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 31
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 44
  • Artificial Intelligence 46
Replace Bryant Lin with:
Bryant Lin United States
Mostafa A. Al‐Alusi United States
Yoshitaka Hirano Japan
A. Pagliaro Italy
Bilal Khan China
Dong Wook Kim South Korea
Richard M. Peterson United States
Sangeetha Balaji India
Athanasios Manolis Greece
Abdullah A. Al‐Shammari Kuwait
Michael Williams relative to Bryant Lin United States Bryant Lin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Bryant Lin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Williams. The network helps show where Michael Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Williams Line = papers co-authored together Michael Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200165
2 200345
3 201831
4 200327
5 201121
6 200613
7 201811
8 201010
9 20178
10 20044
11 20033
12 20203
13 20192
14 20172
15 20242
16 20122
17 20231
18 20031
19 19701
20 20240

About Michael Williams

Michael Williams is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery, General Health Professions, Hematology and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, having authored 21 papers that have together received 252 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sports injuries and prevention (3 papers), Sports Performance and Training (3 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (2 papers), Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (2 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (2 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (2 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (1 paper) and Hip and Femur Fractures (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (32 citations), Medical Terminology (1 citation), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (31 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (44 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (46 citations). Michael Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include William M. Kantor, Bebe Loff, Neil Gibson, Dev Kevat, Ukadike C. Ugbolue, Chris Easton, James Brouner, G. Michael Deeb, Joyce A. Wahr and Kim A. Eagle. Their work appears in journals such as The Medical Journal of Australia, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Strength and conditioning journal, The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research and Frontiers in Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact