Michael Vulpe

22 papers receiving 507 citations

Peers

Michael Vulpe
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 251
  • Rehabilitation 51
  • Insect Science 85
  • Emergency Medicine 44
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 68
Replace Tom Gwinn with:
Tom Gwinn Australia
Steen Matzen Denmark
Caner Feyzi Demir Türkiye
Andrew Roberts United Kingdom
R. Shukla India
Savaş Gürsoy Türkiye
Fernando Alarcón Spain
Adriana Machado Issy Brazil
E.K. Alpar United Kingdom
Christopher Voscopoulos United States
Michael Vulpe relative to Tom Gwinn Australia Tom Gwinn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
Tom Gwinn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Vulpe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Vulpe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Vulpe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Vulpe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Vulpe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Vulpe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Vulpe. The network helps show where Michael Vulpe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Michael Vulpe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Vulpe Line = papers co-authored together Michael Vulpe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992118
2 1995115
3 197051
4 196045
5 198837
6 199121
7
Spinal cord injury. An overview.
199321
8 197920
9
A quantitative immunochemical method for determining serum and cerebrospinal fluid proteins.
196115
10 199314
11 199614
12 199314
13 199511
14 199611
15 196310
16
Pyogenic liver abscesses due to Klebsiella pneumoniae in a diabetic patient.
200110
17 19669
18 19926
19 19954
20 19913

About Michael Vulpe

Michael Vulpe is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Molecular Biology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 554 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (5 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (2 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (2 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (2 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (2 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (2 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (251 citations), Rehabilitation (51 citations), Insect Science (85 citations), Emergency Medicine (44 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (68 citations). Michael Vulpe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Frederic A. Wyle, Ronald A. Sherman, Ibrahim M. Eltorai, Michael R. Cohen, Steven L. Schandler, B. Rozdilsky, Jerrold S. Meyer, Robert R. Young, Goodman M and David L. McArthur. Their work appears in journals such as Spinal Cord, Experimental Neurology, Urologic Clinics of North America, Neurology and Nature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact