Michael Tuck
Impact in
- Spectroscopy top 5%
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
- Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
- Biophysics top 5%
- Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
- Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Papers in
-
- Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies 4
-
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications 4
- Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications 1
- Co-authors
- Nathan Heath Patterson (3 shared papers)Richard M. Caprioli (3 shared papers)Raf Van de Plas (2 shared papers)Nicolas Desbenoît (3 shared papers)Landry Blanc (3 shared papers)Alexis Kaushansky (1 shared paper)Adam Lewis (1 shared paper)Jeremy L. Norris (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Analytical Chemistry (4 papers)Scientific Reports (1 paper)Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience (1 paper)Frontiers in Chemistry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Michael Tuck
7 papers receiving 267 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Spectroscopy 171
- Biophysics 55
- Molecular Biology 149
- Clinical Biochemistry 11
- Analytical Chemistry 16
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Tuck
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Tuck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Tuck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Tuck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Tuck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Tuck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Tuck. The network helps show where Michael Tuck may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Tuck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 80 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 61 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 58 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 51 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 2 |
About Michael Tuck
Michael Tuck is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy, Biophysics, Infectious Diseases and Virology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 269 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (4 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (3 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (1 paper), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (1 paper), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (1 paper), HIV Research and Treatment (1 paper) and HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (171 citations), Biophysics (55 citations), Molecular Biology (149 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (11 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (16 citations). Michael Tuck has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Nathan Heath Patterson, Richard M. Caprioli, Raf Van de Plas, Nicolas Desbenoît, Landry Blanc, Alexis Kaushansky, Adam Lewis, Jeremy L. Norris, Sophie Lecomte and Andreas Römpp. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Scientific Reports, Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience and Frontiers in Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.