Michael Tuck
Impact in
- Spectroscopy top 5%
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
- Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
- Biophysics top 5%
- Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
- Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Papers in
-
- Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research 3
-
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications 4
- Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications 1
- Co-authors
- Nathan Heath Patterson (3 shared papers)Richard M. Caprioli (3 shared papers)Raf Van de Plas (2 shared papers)Landry Blanc (3 shared papers)Nicolas Desbenoît (4 shared papers)Jeremy L. Norris (1 shared paper)Adam J. Lewis (1 shared paper)Alexis Kaushansky (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Analytical Chemistry (4 papers)Scientific Reports (1 paper)Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience (1 paper)Frontiers in Chemistry (1 paper)Lecture notes in computer science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Michael Tuck
7 papers receiving 292 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Spectroscopy 186
- Biophysics 58
- Molecular Biology 155
- Clinical Biochemistry 13
- Analytical Chemistry 17
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Tuck
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Tuck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Tuck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Tuck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Tuck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Tuck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Tuck. The network helps show where Michael Tuck may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Tuck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 87 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 66 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 55 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 0 |
About Michael Tuck
Michael Tuck is a scholar working on Biophysics, Spectroscopy, Virology, Sensory Systems and Molecular Biology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 294 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (4 papers), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (3 papers), Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques (1 paper), Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (1 paper), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (1 paper), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (1 paper) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (186 citations), Biophysics (58 citations), Molecular Biology (155 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (13 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (17 citations). Michael Tuck has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Nathan Heath Patterson, Richard M. Caprioli, Raf Van de Plas, Landry Blanc, Nicolas Desbenoît, Jeremy L. Norris, Adam J. Lewis, Alexis Kaushansky, Sophie Lecomte and Andreas Roempp. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Scientific Reports, Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, Frontiers in Chemistry and Lecture notes in computer science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.