Michael T. Morrow

919 citations
24 papers · 707 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Michael T. Morrow

22 papers receiving 677 citations

Peers

Michael T. Morrow
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Social Psychology 468
  • Clinical Psychology 423
  • Safety Research 73
  • Health 59
  • Applied Psychology 31
Replace Annis Lai Chu Fung with:
Annis Lai Chu Fung Hong Kong
Linqin Ji China
Meghan D. McAuliffe United States
Nina Spröber Germany
Milena Batanova United States
Rhiannon L. Smith United States
Heather Brittain Canada
Jessie Miller Canada
Amy C. Hartl United States
Laura J. Lambe Canada
Michael T. Morrow relative to Annis Lai Chu Fung Hong Kong Annis Lai Chu Fung's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Annis Lai Chu Fung · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael T. Morrow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael T. Morrow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael T. Morrow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael T. Morrow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael T. Morrow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael T. Morrow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael T. Morrow. The network helps show where Michael T. Morrow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Michael T. Morrow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael T. Morrow Line = papers co-authored together Michael T. Morrow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010241
2 200773
3 201451
4 201741
5 200638
6 201535
7 201834
8 201827
9 200827
10 200224
11 201421
12 200920
13 202018
14 201812
15 201512
16 20168
17 20108
18 20186
19
Consultation in Bullying Prevention: An Elementary School Case Study
20154
20 20213

About Michael T. Morrow

Michael T. Morrow is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Education, Plant Science and Safety Research, having authored 24 papers that have together received 707 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (18 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (14 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (7 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (4 papers), Youth Development and Social Support (3 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers) and Parental Involvement in Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (468 citations), Clinical Psychology (423 citations), Safety Research (73 citations), Health (59 citations) and Applied Psychology (31 citations). Michael T. Morrow has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Julie A. Hubbard, Meghan D. McAuliffe, Ronnie M. Rubin, Karen F. Dearing, Stevie N. Grassetti, Meghan McAuliffe Lines, Christopher Hyde, Christina Moore, Vanessa Rose and Elizabeth Comino. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology and Journal of Interpersonal Violence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact