Michael T. Bourke
Impact in
- Genetics top 10%
- Forensic and Genetic Research
- Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
-
- Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
- Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Bone Metabolism and Diseases
Papers in
- Genetics 10
- Forensic and Genetic Research 9
- Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology 1
-
- Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications 3
- Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics 2
- Bone Metabolism and Diseases 1
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Michael S. Adamowicz (3 shared papers)Carll Ladd (2 shared papers)Rita Bortell (1 shared paper)Janet Lee Stein (1 shared paper)Gary S. Stein (1 shared paper)Jane B. Lian (1 shared paper)Linda D. Strausbaugh (1 shared paper)Arianne A. J. Heinrichs (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Forensic Sciences (7 papers)American Journal of Forensic Medicine & Pathology (2 papers)Journal of Cellular Biochemistry (1 paper)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)Biochemistry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Michael T. Bourke
12 papers receiving 312 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Genetics 216
- Molecular Biology 108
- Hematology 18
- Law 13
- Safety Research 10
Countries citing papers authored by Michael T. Bourke
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael T. Bourke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael T. Bourke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael T. Bourke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael T. Bourke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael T. Bourke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael T. Bourke. The network helps show where Michael T. Bourke may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Michael T. Bourke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 69 | |
| 2 | 1997 | 48 | |
| 3 | 1999 | 46 | |
| 4 | 1998 | 37 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 29 | |
| 6 | 1994 | 27 | |
| 7 | 1996 | 26 | |
| 8 | 1999 | 26 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 24 | |
| 10 | 1990 | 23 | |
| 11 | 2000 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2003 | 4 |
About Michael T. Bourke
Michael T. Bourke is a scholar working on Genetics, Molecular Biology, Hematology, Rheumatology and Plant Science, having authored 12 papers that have together received 364 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic and Genetic Research (9 papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (2 papers), Blood groups and transfusion (1 paper), Bone and Dental Protein Studies (1 paper), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (1 paper), Bone Metabolism and Diseases (1 paper) and Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (216 citations), Molecular Biology (108 citations), Hematology (18 citations), Law (13 citations) and Safety Research (10 citations). Michael T. Bourke has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael S. Adamowicz, Carll Ladd, Rita Bortell, Janet Lee Stein, Gary S. Stein, Jane B. Lian, Linda D. Strausbaugh, Arianne A. J. Heinrichs, Robert E. Gaensslen and Farah Aziz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Forensic Sciences, American Journal of Forensic Medicine & Pathology, Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Biochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.