Michael Shea

33 papers receiving 409 citations

Peers

Michael Shea
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Insect Science 146
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 41
  • Geophysics 75
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 25
  • Ecology 127
Replace John T. Shukle with:
John T. Shukle United States
Antonio García‐Moyano Spain
John J. Lynch United States
Joel P. Heath Canada
Barbora Frýdová Czechia
Aude Herrera United Kingdom
Sergio Espinoza Chile
Youwei Wang China
A. V. Bryanskaya Russia
Jennifer Delaney United States
Michael Shea relative to John T. Shukle United States John T. Shukle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
John T. Shukle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Shea

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Shea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Shea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Shea more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Shea

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Shea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Shea. The network helps show where Michael Shea may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Shea, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Shea Line = papers co-authored together Michael Shea links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199268
2
Australian Land Snails Volume 1 - A field guide to eastern Australian species
201041
3 201440
4 201536
5 199234
6 199232
7 201131
8 201317
9 201614
10
Australian Land Snails: A Field Guide to Eastern Australian Species
201014
11 201212
12 199210
13 20128
14 20148
15 20147
16 20137
17 20187
18
Expedition field techniques. Reptiles and amphibians
19926
19 20086
20 20196

About Michael Shea

Michael Shea is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Artificial Intelligence and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 441 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mollusks and Parasites Studies (21 papers), Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (14 papers), Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology (9 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (5 papers), Study of Mite Species (4 papers), Radioactivity and Radon Measurements (4 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (3 papers) and Geological and Geochemical Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (146 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (41 citations), Geophysics (75 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (25 citations) and Ecology (127 citations). Michael Shea has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include John Stanisic, Blanca Barquera, Oscar Juárez, Frank Köhler, Donna L. Bedard, Ashwana D. Fricker, George I. Makhatadze, Ian G. McKinley, Eduardo Penna Franca and J.A.T. Smellie. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Geochemical Exploration, Records of the Australian Museum, Zoosystematics and Evolution, Zootaxa and Journal of Biological Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact