Michael Shaw
Impact in
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Themes in Literature Analysis
- Narrative Theory and Analysis
-
- Visual Culture and Art Theory
Papers in
- History 2
- Scottish History and National Identity 2
- Co-authors
- Marlies E. Kronegger (1 shared paper)Hans Robert Jauß (1 shared paper)Kathleen Sherman (1 shared paper)Margaret Kasschau (1 shared paper)Abhishek Datta (1 shared paper)Marom Bikson (1 shared paper)Leigh Elkins Charvet (1 shared paper)R. A. A. Morrall (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology (1 paper)Literature Compass (1 paper)Journal of Visualized Experiments (1 paper)Feminist Studies (1 paper)Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Michael Shaw
5 papers receiving 122 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Literature and Literary Theory 56
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 24
- Philosophy 43
- General Psychology 3
- Library and Information Sciences 3
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Shaw
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Shaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Shaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Shaw more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Shaw
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Shaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Shaw. The network helps show where Michael Shaw may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Michael Shaw, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1985 | 172 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 12 | |
| 3 | The Wolf-Man : conversations with Freud's patient--sixty years later | 1982 | 12 |
| 4 | 1984 | 1 | |
| 5 | The Fin-de-Siècle Scottish Revival: Romance, Decadence and Celtic Identity | 2019 | 1 |
| 6 | 1976 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 8 | The European Parliament and the Community budget | 1978 | 1 |
| 9 | A distributed problem-solving approach to inductive learning / 91-0109 | 1991 | 0 |
About Michael Shaw
Michael Shaw is a scholar working on History, Museology, Rehabilitation, Neurology and Finance, having authored 9 papers that have together received 201 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Scottish History and National Identity (2 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (1 paper), EU Law and Policy Analysis (1 paper), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper), Irish and British Studies (1 paper), Joseph Conrad and Literature (1 paper), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (1 paper) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (56 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (24 citations), Philosophy (43 citations), General Psychology (3 citations) and Library and Information Sciences (3 citations). Michael Shaw has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Marlies E. Kronegger, Hans Robert Jauß, Kathleen Sherman, Margaret Kasschau, Abhishek Datta, Marom Bikson, Leigh Elkins Charvet, R. A. A. Morrall, Shirley Harkess and Riyaz T. Sikora. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, Literature Compass, Journal of Visualized Experiments, Feminist Studies and Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.