Michael Shacklock
Impact in
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
-
- Peripheral Nerve Disorders
Papers in
- Surgery 32
- Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation 13
- Shoulder Injury and Treatment 12
- Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation 7
-
- Peripheral Nerve Disorders 22
- Co-authors
- Olavi Airaksinen (14 shared papers)Marinko Rade (14 shared papers)Markku Kankaanpää (13 shared papers)Mervi Könönen (8 shared papers)Edward Saulicz (1 shared paper)Tomasz Wolny (1 shared paper)Paweł Linek (1 shared paper)Elena Bueno-Gracía (12 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Michael Shacklock
41 papers receiving 709 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Pharmacology 339
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 368
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 118
- Surgery 424
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 148
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Shacklock
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Shacklock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Shacklock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Shacklock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Shacklock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Shacklock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Shacklock. The network helps show where Michael Shacklock may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Shacklock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clinical neurodynamics : a new system of musculoskeletal treatment | 2005 | 176 |
| 2 | 1995 | 141 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 57 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 53 | |
| 5 | 1996 | 30 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 19 | |
| 9 | Clinical application of neurodynamics | 1995 | 18 |
| 10 | 2014 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 15 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 13 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 11 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 11 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 20 | 1999 | 9 |
About Michael Shacklock
Michael Shacklock is a scholar working on Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pharmacology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 43 papers that have together received 769 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Peripheral Nerve Disorders (22 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (15 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (13 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (13 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (12 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (7 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (5 papers) and Motor Control and Adaptation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (339 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (368 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (118 citations), Surgery (424 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (148 citations). Michael Shacklock has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Finland and Croatia. Frequent co-authors include Olavi Airaksinen, Marinko Rade, Markku Kankaanpää, Mervi Könönen, Edward Saulicz, Tomasz Wolny, Paweł Linek, Elena Bueno-Gracía, Andrzej Myśliwiec and Elena Estébanez-de-Miguel. Their work appears in journals such as Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, Spine, Clinical Biomechanics, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders and Physiotherapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.